2013:groups:higgs:ehd
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/24 17:02] adam.falkowski |
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/30 22:12] lorenzo.basso |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| E.g these decays could be induced by the operator -c|H|^2/v^2 F_{\mu \nu} X_{\mu \nu} where | E.g these decays could be induced by the operator -c|H|^2/v^2 F_{\mu \nu} X_{\mu \nu} where | ||
| X_\mu is a dark vector boson that subsequently decays to the DM particles. gamma+MET decays could also arise from the cascade decays in h-> neutralino+gravitino -> 2xgravitino+gamma in SUSY, see 1203.4563. | X_\mu is a dark vector boson that subsequently decays to the DM particles. gamma+MET decays could also arise from the cascade decays in h-> neutralino+gravitino -> 2xgravitino+gamma in SUSY, see 1203.4563. | ||
| - | Z+MET decays can occur e.g. in inverse see-saw models (ref?) as a cascade decay h-> nu N -> nu Z nu. | + | Z+MET decays can occur e.g. in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> nu N -> nu Z nu. |
| To do: check the constraints on the effective operator, find the maximum allowed branching fraction, check whether some LHC searches (monophotons? mono-Z?) could pick up this decay, devise experimental strategy. Check contraints from existing H-> ZZ | To do: check the constraints on the effective operator, find the maximum allowed branching fraction, check whether some LHC searches (monophotons? mono-Z?) could pick up this decay, devise experimental strategy. Check contraints from existing H-> ZZ | ||
| - | __Interested people:__ Adam, ... | + | __Interested people:__ Adam, Lorenzo, ... |
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| - flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 | - flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 | ||
| - | - lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically, so probably nothing to do. | + | - lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. Also, as before, lepton flavour violating decays can occur in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> l W -> l l' nu, where the flavour of l and l' are not related. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically, so probably nothing to do. |
| - cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible. | - cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible. | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| To do: concrete models, existing constraints and experimental strategies. In particular, interesting to recast the SUSY dilepton+MET searches in this context. | To do: concrete models, existing constraints and experimental strategies. In particular, interesting to recast the SUSY dilepton+MET searches in this context. | ||
| - | __Interested people:__ Jack, Aoife, Andreas | + | __Interested people:__ Jack, Aoife, Andreas, Lorenzo |
| --------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ||
2013/groups/higgs/ehd.txt ยท Last modified: 2013/06/30 22:13 by lorenzo.basso
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
