User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start [2015/06/13 15:33]
veronica.sanz
2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start [2015/06/19 09:16]
andrey.katz
Line 1: Line 1:
 **Chair:** Veronica Sanz (VH), Christoph Englert (HH) **Chair:** Veronica Sanz (VH), Christoph Englert (HH)
  
-**Members:​** Fawzi Boudjema, Adam Falkowski, Benjamin Fuks, Florian Goertz, Jose Santiago, Jose Miguel No, Felix Yu, Adam Martin, ​Cirian ​Williams. **Please add your name if it is missing.**+**Members:​** Fawzi Boudjema, Adam Falkowski, Benjamin Fuks, Florian Goertz, Jose Santiago, Jose Miguel No, Felix Yu, Adam Martin, ​Ciaran ​Williams, Ken Mimasu, Alexandra Oliveira, Alberto Tonero, Andrey Katz. **Please add your name if it is missing.**
  
 __Topics for discussion VH:__ __Topics for discussion VH:__
-Eq. B.28-B.29+     * Analyses 
 +           - ATLAS: ​ VH(-> bb) in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1409.6212.pdf]]  
 +           - ATLAS: VH(->WW) [[https://​atlas.web.cern.ch/​Atlas/​GROUPS/​PHYSICS/​CONFNOTES/​ATLAS-CONF-2015-005/​]] 
 +           - CMS:​VH(->​bb) [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​CMSPublic/​Hig13012PubTWiki]] and legacy paper [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​CMSPublic/​Hig14009PaperTwiki]] 
 + 
 + 
 +     * SM contributions to VH at one loop: Fawzi to dig old works on this. recast some one-loop V^3 into h V^2 
 +     * tree-level:  
 +            - Dilaton, radion exchange: Matching in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]]. Ken for form factora. 
 +            - Composite Higgs type spin-one exchange: 2 Adams, Cedric, Andrey. Adam F, Florian, UV with S->0. 
 +     * one-loop: 
 +            - 2HDM: Matching in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]]. Ken 
 +            - Colored scalars: region of cancellations in gg-> h can be seen in Eq.18 of [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1207.7355.pdf]],​ see also [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1312.3317.pdf]]. Matching colored scalars with EFT in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1412.1837v1.pdf]] and [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.02409.pdf]] for non-degenerate stopsAdam M and Felix Andrey 
 +            - Spin-one: From Composite-Higgs type. Alexandra O.  
 +              - Not possible from MC point of view, I understood that is maybe non relevant in kinematics point of view,  it would act like more terms to the renormalization of three level coupling 
 +     * Pseudo-Observables:​ VS, FB 
 +     * Presentation of results together with the HXSWG, feducial cross sections: VS, CPE
  
-     ​* ​ 
 __Topics for discussion HH:__ __Topics for discussion HH:__
   - How big can pp>HH be in concrete UV scenarios ​   - How big can pp>HH be in concrete UV scenarios ​
-     * colored scalars (recast MSSM?) : region of cancellations in gg-> h can be seen in Eq.18 of [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1207.7355.pdf]],​ see also [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1312.3317.pdf]]. Matching colored scalars with EFT in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1412.1837v1.pdf]] and [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.02409.pdf]]for non-degenerate stops. +     * colored scalars (recast MSSM?) : region of cancellations in gg-> h can be seen in Eq.18 of [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1207.7355.pdf]],​ see also [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1312.3317.pdf]]. Matching colored scalars with EFT in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1412.1837v1.pdf]] and [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.02409.pdf]] for non-degenerate stops. ​VS, FY + BSM 
-     * 2HDM : Matching of the c_6 to 2HDM is in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]],​ Eq 3.41, and Eq. 3.28 in the alignment limit.  +     * 2HDM : Matching of the c_6 to 2HDM is in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]],​ Eq 3.41, and Eq. 3.28 in the alignment limit. ​CPE, BF 
-  - What is the EFT parameter range expected from such scenarios +     * Scalar fourplet of SU(2)_L only induces c_6 at the tree level (see e.g. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1412.8480):​ FG 
-  ​Are dim 6 unitarity constraints relevant for the limit setting +     * Setup without relevant operator (mu^2=0) -> large enhancement of pp>HH (factor 2-3), http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.00355v2.pdf:​ FG  
-  - How much can we learn from binned distribution at a small expected signal yield+  - What is the EFT parameter range expected from such scenarios ​(-> //​deliverable//:​ c_6 vs Lambda contour plot) CD (composite Higgs), JN (2HDM), CPE, FG 
 +  - How much can we learn from binned distribution at a small expected signal yield (-> //​deliverable//:​ compare differential distributions for H>hh (with m_H large) and EFT, binned log-likelihood hypothesis test to quantify consistency) 
 +     * 5 parameters EFT scan translated to 2D kinematics to set experimental benchmarks https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​Sandbox/​NonResonantHHAtLHC 
 +     * Allow combination of different channels by coordinating bins/​benchmarks
   - Backgrounds in HH   - Backgrounds in HH
-     * mass resolution of Higgs tagging ​  ​ +     * mass resolution of Higgs tagging ​(CP and CPE) 
-         * Can we control Z>​bbar ​+         * Can we control Z>​bbar ​(-> //​deliverable//:​ estimate, simulate or dig out expected resolution)
          * can we disentangle dim 6 effects from qq>HZ leakage          * can we disentangle dim 6 effects from qq>HZ leakage
-     * What is needed to control the backgrounds better ​   
2015/groups/higgs/eftvhval/start.txt · Last modified: 2015/06/19 10:30 by adam.falkowski