User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start [2015/06/13 14:28]
christof.englert
2015:groups:higgs:eftvhval:start [2015/06/19 10:30] (current)
adam.falkowski
Line 1: Line 1:
 **Chair:** Veronica Sanz (VH), Christoph Englert (HH) **Chair:** Veronica Sanz (VH), Christoph Englert (HH)
  
-**Members:​** Fawzi Boudjema, Adam Falkowski, Benjamin Fuks, Florian Goertz, Jose Santiago, Jose Miguel No, Felix Yu, Adam Martin, ​Cirian ​Williams. **Please add your name if it is missing.**+**Members:​** Fawzi Boudjema, Adam Falkowski, Benjamin Fuks, Florian Goertz, Jose Santiago, Jose Miguel No, Felix Yu, Adam Martin, ​Ciaran ​Williams, Ken Mimasu, Alexandra Oliveira, Alberto Tonero, Andrey Katz. **Please add your name if it is missing.** 
 + 
 +__Topics for discussion VH:__ 
 +     * Analyses 
 +           - ATLAS: ​ VH(-> bb) in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1409.6212.pdf]]  
 +           - ATLAS: VH(->WW) [[https://​atlas.web.cern.ch/​Atlas/​GROUPS/​PHYSICS/​CONFNOTES/​ATLAS-CONF-2015-005/​]] 
 +           - CMS:​VH(->​bb) [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​CMSPublic/​Hig13012PubTWiki]] and legacy paper [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​CMSPublic/​Hig14009PaperTwiki]] 
 + 
 + 
 +     * SM contributions to VH at one loop: Fawzi to dig old works on this. recast some one-loop V^3 into h V^2 
 +     * tree-level:  
 +            - Dilaton, radion exchange: Matching in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]]. Ken for form factora. 
 +            - Composite Higgs type spin-one exchange Adam M., Cedric, Andrey, Adam F., Florian. Model with a custodial triplet is proposed e.g. [[http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1406.7320|1406.7320]]. It predicts large S, so one may need to tweak it to obtain a realistic (fine-tuned) model with a light resonance.  
 +     * one-loop: 
 +            - 2HDM: Matching in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]]. Ken 
 +            - Colored scalars: region of cancellations in gg-> h can be seen in Eq.18 of [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1207.7355.pdf]],​ see also [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1312.3317.pdf]]. Matching colored scalars with EFT in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1412.1837v1.pdf]] and [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.02409.pdf]] for non-degenerate stops. Adam M and Felix Andrey 
 +            - Spin-one: From Composite-Higgs type. Alexandra O.  
 +              - Not possible from MC point of view, I understood that is maybe non relevant in kinematics point of view,  it would act like more terms to the renormalization of three level coupling 
 +     * Pseudo-Observables:​ VS, FB 
 +     * Presentation of results together with the HXSWG, feducial cross sections: VS, CPE
  
 __Topics for discussion HH:__ __Topics for discussion HH:__
   - How big can pp>HH be in concrete UV scenarios ​   - How big can pp>HH be in concrete UV scenarios ​
-     * colored scalars (recast MSSM?) +     * colored scalars (recast MSSM?​) ​: region of cancellations in gg-> h can be seen in Eq.18 of [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1207.7355.pdf]],​ see also [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1312.3317.pdf]]. Matching colored scalars with EFT in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1412.1837v1.pdf]] and [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.02409.pdf]] for non-degenerate stops. VS, FY + BSM 
-     * 2HDM +     * 2HDM : Matching of the c_6 to 2HDM is in [[http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1502.07352.pdf]],​ Eq 3.41, and Eq. 3.28 in the alignment limit. CPE, BF 
-  - What is the EFT parameter range expected from such scenarios +     * Scalar fourplet of SU(2)_L only induces c_6 at the tree level (see e.g. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1412.8480):​ FG 
-  ​Are dim 6 unitarity constraints relevant for the limit setting +     * Setup without relevant operator (mu^2=0) -> large enhancement of pp>HH (factor 2-3), http://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1504.00355v2.pdf:​ FG  
-  - How much can we learn from binned distribution at a small expected signal yield+  - What is the EFT parameter range expected from such scenarios ​(-> //​deliverable//:​ c_6 vs Lambda contour plot) CD (composite Higgs), JN (2HDM), CPE, FG 
 +  - How much can we learn from binned distribution at a small expected signal yield (-> //​deliverable//:​ compare differential distributions for H>hh (with m_H large) and EFT, binned log-likelihood hypothesis test to quantify consistency) 
 +     * 5 parameters EFT scan translated to 2D kinematics to set experimental benchmarks https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​bin/​view/​Sandbox/​NonResonantHHAtLHC 
 +     * Allow combination of different channels by coordinating bins/​benchmarks
   - Backgrounds in HH   - Backgrounds in HH
-     * mass resolution of Higgs tagging ​  ​ +     * mass resolution of Higgs tagging ​(CP and CPE) 
-         * Can we control Z>​bbar ​+         * Can we control Z>​bbar ​(-> //​deliverable//:​ estimate, simulate or dig out expected resolution)
          * can we disentangle dim 6 effects from qq>HZ leakage          * can we disentangle dim 6 effects from qq>HZ leakage
-     * What is needed to control the backgrounds better ​   
- 
- 
2015/groups/higgs/eftvhval/start.1434198534.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/06/13 14:28 by christof.englert