User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:bsm:rdm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49]
jose.zurita
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 17:19] (current)
jose.zurita
Line 3: Line 3:
 Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee,​ Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay, Adil Jueid. Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee,​ Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay, Adil Jueid.
  
-[Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!]+[Feel free to edit tasks!]
  
 Goal (pseudo-ambitious):​ study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter. Goal (pseudo-ambitious):​ study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter.
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds.
 +
 b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed).
-c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL <= yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies+ 
 +c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL < = yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies
  
 3) Relic density: from coannihilation,​ GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO. 3) Relic density: from coannihilation,​ GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO.
Line 27: Line 29:
 4) Recasting collider searches: 4) Recasting collider searches:
 i) Benj wants to set-up the recast of the LQ_res + MET search. i) Benj wants to set-up the recast of the LQ_res + MET search.
-ii) Bounds on chi1 come from mono/​multi-jet + MET. Some of these were recasted in Fig.7 of [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1703.00452.pdf|this fantastic paper]] (take the XF3 shade), which means that 500-600 GeV were excluded with the ATLAS 13.3 fb-1 search, and that HL-LHC will push the bounds to 1.1 - 1.3 TeV. Bound is almost independent on the compression (mchi1-mchi0).+ii) Bounds on chi1 come from mono/​multi-jet + MET. Some of these were recasted in Fig.7 of [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1703.00452.pdf|1703.00452]] (take the XF3 shaded region), which means that 500-600 GeV were excluded with the ATLAS 13.3 fb-1 search, and that HL-LHC will push the bounds to 1.1 - 1.3 TeV. Bound is almost independent on the compression (mchi1-mchi0).
 iii) bounds from l + LQ, where LQ -> a) tau charm, b) top +tau and c) b nu. Easier to have the charm in the initial state, due to PDF suppression (but b is also possible). Giacomo, José and Jordan will look into existing searches that could give constraints. iii) bounds from l + LQ, where LQ -> a) tau charm, b) top +tau and c) b nu. Easier to have the charm in the initial state, due to PDF suppression (but b is also possible). Giacomo, José and Jordan will look into existing searches that could give constraints.
 +
 +5) 1-loop direct detection is under investigation
 +
 +6) Jordan will set-up a Dropbox folder for the project
  
  
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.1561646968.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/06/27 16:49 by jose.zurita