User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars:exotichdecays

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars:exotichdecays [2019/06/24 17:13]
jose.miguel.no
2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars:exotichdecays [2019/06/25 14:12]
kohsaku.tobioka
Line 26: Line 26:
 __TO DO LIST__ ​ __TO DO LIST__ ​
  
 +  - ASK FOR FEYNRULES FILE! 
   - Validate UFO File {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp-pr.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} (fixed by Peter Richardson) from Bauer, Thamm, Neubert. **[JN, SW]** //NOTE: We need to check for effective ggh coupling in UFO.// (CHECKED: They Have it, so we can generate gluon fusion production of $h$)   - Validate UFO File {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp-pr.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} (fixed by Peter Richardson) from Bauer, Thamm, Neubert. **[JN, SW]** //NOTE: We need to check for effective ggh coupling in UFO.// (CHECKED: They Have it, so we can generate gluon fusion production of $h$)
   - SM background generation. **[SG,AL]**   - SM background generation. **[SG,AL]**
Line 32: Line 33:
   - Other constraints. 1) Higgs signal strengths bound on partial BSM width **[JN, SW]** 2) LEP Z width: Z → $h^*$ $\phi$, $h^*\to bb...$ leads to constraints from Z total width. **[JN, SW]** 3) LEP Exclusive Z decays? 4)...   - Other constraints. 1) Higgs signal strengths bound on partial BSM width **[JN, SW]** 2) LEP Z width: Z → $h^*$ $\phi$, $h^*\to bb...$ leads to constraints from Z total width. **[JN, SW]** 3) LEP Exclusive Z decays? 4)...
    
-  * $\phi$ -> $\mu\mu$ Possiblly useful refs ($h\to ZZ^*\to4\mu$[[https://​cds.cern.ch/​record/​2621479/​files/​ATLAS-CONF-2018-018.pdf| ATLAS-CONF-2018-018]],​[[https://​cds.cern.ch/​record/​2668684/​files/​HIG-19-001-pas.pdf|CMS]];​ $h\to aa\to4\mu$[[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1812.00380|1812.00380]];​ $h\to aa\to2\tau2\mu$ [[https://​inspirehep.net/​record/​1419565/​files/​HIG-15-011-pas.pdf|HIG-15-011-pas]],​ [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1505.01609.pdf|1505.01609]])+  * $\phi$ -> $\mu\mu$ Possiblly useful refs ($h\to ZZ^*\to4\mu$[[https://​cds.cern.ch/​record/​2621479/​files/​ATLAS-CONF-2018-018.pdf| ATLAS-CONF-2018-018]],​[[https://​cds.cern.ch/​record/​2668684/​files/​HIG-19-001-pas.pdf|CMS]];​ $h\to aa\to4\mu$[[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1812.00380|1812.00380]];​ $h\to aa\to2\tau2\mu$ [[https://​inspirehep.net/​record/​1419565/​files/​HIG-15-011-pas.pdf|HIG-15-011-pas]],​ [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1505.01609.pdf|1505.01609]]; $h\to ZZ_d\to 4l$[[http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1802.03388|1802.03388]])
  
 Similar strategy to the one above! ​ In principle above 10 GeV we are safe from SM low mass resonances. Below 10 GeV? Also, how low can one go in mass by playing with muon isolation. Similar strategy to the one above! ​ In principle above 10 GeV we are safe from SM low mass resonances. Below 10 GeV? Also, how low can one go in mass by playing with muon isolation.
2019/groups/higgs/lightscalars/exotichdecays.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/26 09:20 by antoine.lesauvage