This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/30 22:12] lorenzo.basso |
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/30 22:13] lorenzo.basso |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
- flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 | - flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 | ||
- | - lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. Also, as before, lepton flavour violating decays can occur in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> l W -> l l' nu, where the flavour of l and l' are not related. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically, so probably nothing to do. | + | - lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. Also, as before, lepton flavour violating decays can occur in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> nu N -> nu l W -> nu l l' nu', where the flavour of l and l' are not related. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically, so probably nothing to do. |
- cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible. | - cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible. |