User Tools

Site Tools


2013:groups:higgs:ehd

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/30 22:12]
lorenzo.basso
2013:groups:higgs:ehd [2013/06/30 22:13] (current)
lorenzo.basso
Line 40: Line 40:
 - flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 ​ - flavor violating decays to quarks, probably hopeless given the constraints from flavor violation, see e.g. 1209.1397 ​
  
-- lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. Also, as before, lepton flavour violating decays can occur in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> l W -> l l' nu, where the flavour of l and l' are not related. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically,​ so probably nothing to do. +- lepton flavor violating decays (h->tau mu, h-> tau e, h-> mu e), the first two are promising, see e.g. 1209.1397. Also, as before, lepton flavour violating decays can occur in inverse see-saw models (see e.g., 1209.4803) as a cascade decay h-> ​nu N -> nu l W -> nu l l' nu', where the flavour of l and l' are not related. These decays are searched for by experiment and has been quite thoroughly studied theoretically,​ so probably nothing to do. 
  
 - cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible.  ​ - cascade decays h->X a -> X f fbar, where X is invisible.  ​
2013/groups/higgs/ehd.1372623147.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2013/06/30 22:12 by lorenzo.basso