User Tools

Site Tools


2013:groups:np:effectivedm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2013:groups:np:effectivedm [2013/06/18 11:44]
kiel.howe
2013:groups:np:effectivedm [2013/06/20 12:11]
fawzi.boudjema
Line 15: Line 15:
 ^Name ^ e-mail ^ ^Name ^ e-mail ^
 | Kiel Howe | howek@stanford.edu | | Kiel Howe | howek@stanford.edu |
 +| Brian Shuve | bshuve@perimeterinstitute.ca |
 +| Gordan Krnjaic | gkrnjaic@perimeterinstitute.ca |
 +| Andreas Goudelis | andreas.goudelis@lapth.cnrs.fr |
 +| Csaba Balazs | csaba.balazs@monash.edu |
 +| Yun Jiang | yunjiang@ucdavis.edu |
 +| Alex Arbey | alexandre.arbey@ens-lyon.fr |
 +| Fawzi Boudjema| boudjema@lapth.cnrs.fr|
  
 ==== Improving sensitivity of monojet-like searches ==== ==== Improving sensitivity of monojet-like searches ====
Line 22: Line 29:
 Interested people:  ​ Interested people:  ​
 ^Name ^ e-mail ^ ^Name ^ e-mail ^
-|   ​| ​  ​|+Marija Marjanovic ​  | marija.marjanovic@cern.ch  ​|
  
 ==== Exploring other signal channels for simplest UV completions of effective operators ==== ==== Exploring other signal channels for simplest UV completions of effective operators ====
Line 37: Line 44:
 ^Name ^ e-mail ^ ^Name ^ e-mail ^
 | Kiel Howe  | howek@stanford.edu ​  | | Kiel Howe  | howek@stanford.edu ​  |
 +| Brian Shuve | bshuve@perimeterinstitute.ca |
 +| Andreas Goudelis | andreas.goudelis@lapth.cnrs.fr |
 +| Aoife Bharucha | aoife.bharucha@desy.de |
 +| Gordan Krnjaic | gkrnjaic@perimeterinstitute.ca|
  
 +==== Interpretation of the LHC monojet searches in terms of indirect detection and relic density ====
  
 +Goal - the monojet searches at the LHC are currently reinterpreted (in a simple effective model with one mediator and one DM particle) in terms of dark matter scattering cross-sections with matter, as in direct detection experiments. Can we set also limits on indirect detection (gamma, proton, anti-proton spectra)? And can we deduce a lower limit on the relic density? Additional questions:
 +  * which effective models are the most strongly constrained?​
 +  * what if more than one mediator/​operator is present?
 +  * which models are interesting?​
 +  * can we reinterpret the DM direct search results in terms of LHC cross-section?​
  
 +Interested people:  ​
 +^Name ^ e-mail ^
 +| Alex Arbey | alexandre.arbey@ens-lyon.fr |
 +| Genevieve Belanger | belanger@lapth.cnrs.fr |
 +| Andreas Goudelis | andreas.goudelis@lapth.cnrs.fr |
 +| Nazila Mahmoudi | nazila@cern.ch |
 +| Sacha Pukhov | pukhov@lapth.cnrs.fr |
 +| Yun Jiang | yunjiang@ucdavis.edu |
 +|Fawzi Boudjema| boudjema@lapth.cnrs.fr|
  
 ---- ----
Line 67: Line 93:
   * Tait et. al. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1108.1196   * Tait et. al. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1108.1196
   * ...   * ...
 +
 +Mediator production:
 +  * Dijet resonances: An et al. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1202.2894v1
 +  * Associated production: An et al. http://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1212.2221
 +  * and references therein
 ===== Beyond Effective dark matter ===== ===== Beyond Effective dark matter =====
  
2013/groups/np/effectivedm.txt ยท Last modified: 2013/06/20 12:24 by balazs.csaba