User Tools

Site Tools


2013:groups:sm:higgs:hdijets

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2013:groups:sm:higgs:hdijets [2013/06/10 11:51]
marek.schoenherr [Observables and binnings]
2013:groups:sm:higgs:hdijets [2014/02/12 11:13] (current)
marek.schoenherr [H+dijets (ggF) uncertainty study]
Line 3: Line 3:
 This study aims at quantifying the gluon fusion contribution (and its uncertainty) to typical VBF Higgs plus two jets event selections. A Rivet analysis implementing the observables for the event selections below can be found {{:​2013:​hdijets-analysis.tgz|here}}. This study aims at quantifying the gluon fusion contribution (and its uncertainty) to typical VBF Higgs plus two jets event selections. A Rivet analysis implementing the observables for the event selections below can be found {{:​2013:​hdijets-analysis.tgz|here}}.
  
 +The results of this study have been collected on a separate page: [[2013:​groups:​sm:​higgs:​hdijetsresults|Results of the h+dijets (ggF) uncertainty study]].
  
 ===== Foreseen contributions ===== ===== Foreseen contributions =====
  
 **Korinna Zapp, Marek Schoenherr** Sherpa MEPS@NLO (0,​1,​2@NLO) ​ **Korinna Zapp, Marek Schoenherr** Sherpa MEPS@NLO (0,​1,​2@NLO) ​
 +
 +**Jeppe R. Andersen, Jennifer M. Smillie,​...** HEJ
 +
 +**Stefan Prestel, Leif Lönnblad** Pythia8 UNLOPS, HJJ POWHEG
 ===== Setup ===== ===== Setup =====
  
-Five flavour calculation,​ PDF is CT10nlo (old fortran LHAGLUE-ID 11000). Masless b-quarks, no bbh-coupling (Yukawa_b=0). Thus, only the effective coupling of gluons to the Higgs is present and calculated in the infinte top mass limit. Perturbative QCD calculation (e.g. no multiparton interaction,​ no hadronisation,​ no intrinsic kperp).+Five flavour calculation,​ PDF is CT10nlo (old fortran LHAGLUE-ID 11000). Masless b-quarks, no bbh-coupling (Yukawa_b=0). Thus, only the effective coupling of gluons to the Higgs is present and calculated in the infinte top mass limit. Perturbative QCD calculation (e.g. no multiparton interaction,​ no hadronisation,​ no intrinsic kperp). Stable Higgs with mH = 125 GeV (wH = 4.07 MeV, only if needed for extrapolation from one decay mode). E_CMS = 8 TeV.
 ===== Event selections ===== ===== Event selections =====
 +
 +i) Inclusive Higgs production
 +
 +Histogram the respective observable for inclusive Higgs production and Higgs production in association with at least one jet.
 +
 +ii) Higgs plus dijet production
  
 There are multiple ways of defining the two tagging jets/dijet system for this process. Two such selection which are expected to exhibit a somewhat different behaviour wrt. perturbative stability are (in close resemblance to the dijet gap fraction analysis of arXiv:​1107.1641):​ There are multiple ways of defining the two tagging jets/dijet system for this process. Two such selection which are expected to exhibit a somewhat different behaviour wrt. perturbative stability are (in close resemblance to the dijet gap fraction analysis of arXiv:​1107.1641):​
Line 24: Line 35:
    two tagging jets (according to A or B): anti-kT, R = 0.4, pT > 30 GeV, |eta| < 5    two tagging jets (according to A or B): anti-kT, R = 0.4, pT > 30 GeV, |eta| < 5
    the 3rd jet is defined as the non-tagjet with largest pT    the 3rd jet is defined as the non-tagjet with largest pT
 +   3rd jet: anti-kT, R = 0.4, pT > 30 GeV, |eta| < 5
  
 2) VBF event selection 2) VBF event selection
    VBF topological cuts applied on tagging jets : m(jj) > 400 GeV, dy(jj) > 2.8    VBF topological cuts applied on tagging jets : m(jj) > 400 GeV, dy(jj) > 2.8
    the 3rd jet is defined as the non-tagjet with largest pT in between the tagging jets in rapidity    the 3rd jet is defined as the non-tagjet with largest pT in between the tagging jets in rapidity
 +   3rd jet: anti-kT, R = 0.4, pT > 30 GeV, |eta| < 5
 +
 ===== Observables and binnings ===== ===== Observables and binnings =====
  
Line 33: Line 47:
 (h Higgs, j1 leading tag jet, j2 subleading tagjet, j3 as defined above) (h Higgs, j1 leading tag jet, j2 subleading tagjet, j3 as defined above)
  
-* pT(h)        [0,​300] ​  60 bins +|}
- +
-* y(h)         ​[-5,​5] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* pT(j1) ​      ​[0,​300] ​  60 bins +
- +
-* pT(j2) ​      ​[0,​300] ​  60 bins +
- +
-* y(j1)        [-5,​5] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* y(j2)        [-5,​5] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* m(j1,​j2) ​    ​[0,​1000] ​ 25 bins +
- +
-* dy(j1,​j2) ​   [0,​10] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* dphi(j1,​j2) ​ [0,​pi] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* pT(j3) ​      ​[0,​300] ​  60 bins +
- +
-* y(j3)        [-5,​5] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* y*           ​[-5,​5] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* dphi(h,​j1j2) [0,​pi] ​   20 bins +
- +
-* pT(hj1j2) ​   [0,​300] ​  60 bins +
- +
-|y*(h)| ​     [0,​10] ​   20 bins         +
- +
-* Njet(incl) ​  ​[0,​4] ​     5 bins +
- +
-* sigma(h in between j1 and j2)/​sigma(dijet) ​+
  
 +|-
 +| pT(h)        || [0,​300] ​  || 60 bins ||
 +|-
 +| y(h)         || [-5,​5] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| pT(j1) ​      || [0,​300] ​  || 60 bins ||
 +|-
 +| pT(j2) ​      || [0,​300] ​  || 60 bins ||
 +|-
 +| y(j1)        || [-5,​5] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| y(j2)        || [-5,​5] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| m(j1,​j2) ​    || [0,​1000] ​ || 25 bins ||
 +|-
 +| dy(j1,​j2) ​   || [0,​10] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| dphi(j1,​j2) ​ || [0,​pi] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| pT(j3) ​      || [0,​300] ​  || 60 bins ||
 +|-
 +| y(j3)        || [-5,​5] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| y*           || [-5,​5] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| dphi(h,​j1j2) || [0,​pi] ​   || 20 bins ||
 +|-
 +| pT(hj1j2) ​   || [0,​300] ​  || 60 bins ||
 +|-
 +| abs(y*(h)) ​  || [0,​10] ​   || 20 bins ||     
 +|-
 +| Njet(incl) ​  || [0,4]     ​|| ​ 5 bins ||
 +|-
 +| sigma(h in between j1 and j2)/​sigma(dijet) ||
 +|}
  
 ===== Uncertainty study ===== ===== Uncertainty study =====
2013/groups/sm/higgs/hdijets.1370857917.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/06/10 11:51 by marek.schoenherr