User Tools

Site Tools


2013:groups:tools:dlha

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2013:groups:tools:dlha [2013/06/20 15:36]
balazs.csaba
2013:groups:tools:dlha [2013/06/20 17:24] (current)
balazs.csaba
Line 16: Line 16:
   * Elevate the DLH agreement to a DLH Accord,   * Elevate the DLH agreement to a DLH Accord,
   * Start implementing DLHA in dark matter calculators.   * Start implementing DLHA in dark matter calculators.
 +    * Testing DLHA between at least two codes is essential before the final report is completed.
  
 ==== 1st discussion ==== ==== 1st discussion ====
Line 38: Line 39:
     * The table header should look like this:      * The table header should look like this: 
       * TABLE <​name>​ <​column>​ <row>       * TABLE <​name>​ <​column>​ <row>
-    * The name will probably be inherited from the function+    * The name will probably be inherited from the function.
     * In some cases, when the table can be given in different parametrizations/​coordinates,​ the name will have to include info about about this.     * In some cases, when the table can be given in different parametrizations/​coordinates,​ the name will have to include info about about this.
     * We should consider the I/O of "​external"​ tables, namely table I/O from/to a separate (non-DLHA) file.     * We should consider the I/O of "​external"​ tables, namely table I/O from/to a separate (non-DLHA) file.
Line 53: Line 54:
   * A DLHA reader/​writer prototype can be created based on SLHA+.   * A DLHA reader/​writer prototype can be created based on SLHA+.
   * FUNCTION I/O should happen via arrays.   * FUNCTION I/O should happen via arrays.
-  * We should consider agreeing about the I/O of existing methods in existing calculators. ​ (For abundance, direct or indirect detection calculations,​ for example.) ​ Then the authors of the codes could distribute ​libraries (for Linuxfrom which these methods could be called directly based on DLHA.+  * We should consider agreeing about the I/O of existing methods in existing calculators. ​ (For abundance, direct or indirect detection calculations,​ for example.) ​ Then the authors of the codes could distribute ​a pre-compiled ​Linux library ​from which these methods could be called directly based on DLHA
 +  * We should specify the number of significant figures (16 was suggested) for numerical values.
  
 ==== Things to do ==== ==== Things to do ====
   * The write-up has to be updated to reflect the changes we decide to make at LH13.   * The write-up has to be updated to reflect the changes we decide to make at LH13.
   * ...   * ...
2013/groups/tools/dlha.1371735362.txt.gz · Last modified: 2013/06/20 15:36 by balazs.csaba