This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2013:groups:tools:matching [2013/06/07 16:21] andy.buckley created |
2013:groups:tools:matching [2013/06/17 15:12] (current) klaus.rabbertz [Generators of interest] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==== Remaining freedom in μF and μR ==== | ==== Remaining freedom in μF and μR ==== | ||
- | Argument that $\mu_R = k p_T^2(inargumentof\alpha_sforbothMEandPS)shouldnaturallyhavek \sim 0.4fromNLLA_2term equivalencetoscalemodification(cf.FrankKrauss).Thisork = 1$ both viable. Explore both. | + | Argument that μR=kpT (in argument of αs for both ME and PS) should naturally have k∼0.4 from NLL A2 term ~equivalence to scale modification (cf. Frank Krauss). This or k=1 both viable. Explore both. |
Effect of ×2 variations on μR: include both schemes, so use k={0.2,0.4,1.0,2.0} settings for comparison. | Effect of ×2 variations on μR: include both schemes, so use k={0.2,0.4,1.0,2.0} settings for comparison. | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
===== Comparison study ===== | ===== Comparison study ===== | ||
- | Evaluate effect of different matching procedures for dijet events at NLO. Using Rivet ATLAS & CMS analyses of R32, inclusive/dijet spectra and jet rates (and ratios), jet shapes and pile-up/UE-robust jet mass etc. **Restrict to dijet process at NLO for now.** | + | Evaluate effect of different matching procedures for dijet events at NLO. Using Rivet ATLAS & CMS analyses of inclusive/dijet spectra, R32 and jet rates (and ratios), jet shapes and pile-up/UE-robust jet mass etc. **Restrict to dijet process at NLO for now.** |
Include scale variations //and// scheme uncertainties separately. | Include scale variations //and// scheme uncertainties separately. | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* POWHEG-BOX + PYTHIA6? (1 scheme x 2 αs(MZ)) | * POWHEG-BOX + PYTHIA6? (1 scheme x 2 αs(MZ)) | ||
* Sherpa MC@NLO | * Sherpa MC@NLO | ||
+ | * BlackHat + Sherpa ? | ||
+ | * Njet + Sherpa ? | ||
* (a)MC@NLO+Herwig++? | * (a)MC@NLO+Herwig++? | ||
* Herwig++ MatchBox? | * Herwig++ MatchBox? | ||
* Pythia8 UNLOPS? | * Pythia8 UNLOPS? | ||
+ | * HEJ | ||
* //More?// | * //More?// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Planning session blackboard: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{planning_session.jpg}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- //[[klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch|Klaus Rabbertz]] 2013/06/17 15:12// | ||
+ | |||
+ | We have provided a step by step guide for generation of | ||
+ | fixed order events with NJet+Sherpa via the NJet website | ||
+ | [[https://bitbucket.org/njet/njet/wiki/NJetSherpa2_0_beta|Event Generation with NJet+Sherpa]] | ||
+ | Get in touch with Valery(yundin@nbi.dk) or myself if it needs any clarification/doesn't work etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- //[[badger@nbi.dk|Simon Badger]] 2013/06/11 17:50// | ||
+ | ==== Other ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:2013:groups:tools:powheg-matching-schemes.pdf|Slides on POWHEG+Pythia8}} | ||
+ | {{:2013:nlo_matched_20130607.pdf|More slides on POWHEG+Pythia and Herwig etc}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | * systematic variation of underlying event simulation: eigentunes? other ideas? | ||
+ | * PDF uncertainties: how to do them properly in the shower? is this important? |