This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2015:groups:higgs:morehiggs:largesplit [2015/06/11 17:53] adam.falkowski created |
2015:groups:higgs:morehiggs:largesplit [2015/06/13 15:32] jose_miguel.no |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
**Members:** Ken Mimasu, Werner Porod, Jérémy Bernon, Andrey Katz, Dipan Sengupta | **Members:** Ken Mimasu, Werner Porod, Jérémy Bernon, Andrey Katz, Dipan Sengupta | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Idea**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | What are the current 8 TeV LHC constraints and 13/14 TeV LHC prospects for new scalars with sizable mass splittings, such that decays H1 -> H2 V or H1 -> H2 H2 are important/dominant? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Let's consider the above idea more concretely in the context of 2HDM. There is no a priory reason to expect that the neutral states A0, H0 should be close in mass (one of the two has to relatively close in mass to H+ due to T-parameter constraints). When |m_A0 - m_H0| > m_Z, either decay A0 -> H0 Z or H0 -> A0 Z becomes available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Literature**: | ||
+ | |||
+ |