This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2015:groups:sm:nnlopropagation [2015/06/07 18:45] badger.simon created |
2015:groups:sm:nnlopropagation [2015/06/07 18:47] badger.simon |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
analysis. | analysis. | ||
- | * Quantifying cost of NNLO computations | + | == Quantifying cost of NNLO computations == |
Attempt to produce a table which compares the CPU time / number of weighted events | Attempt to produce a table which compares the CPU time / number of weighted events | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
- H+j with sector decompositions improved FKS subtraction | - H+j with sector decompositions improved FKS subtraction | ||
- H+j/W+j with N-jettiness subtraction | - H+j/W+j with N-jettiness subtraction | ||
+ | - low pT (0.5 GeV) NLO H+j wit Sherpa (as a contribution to incl. Higgs) | ||
- WW/ZZ/ZA/WA/AA with qT subtraction | - WW/ZZ/ZA/WA/AA with qT subtraction | ||
- di-jets/e+e-->3j with Antenna subtraction [need to ask Glover/Gehrmann et al.] | - di-jets/e+e-->3j with Antenna subtraction [need to ask Glover/Gehrmann et al.] | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
Also try to estimate the size of a basic Root Ntuple format in these cases. | Also try to estimate the size of a basic Root Ntuple format in these cases. | ||
- | * Ntuples with e+e- -> 3jets with EERAD3 | + | == NNLO Ntuple test case with e+e- -> 3jets with EERAD3 == |
- | + | Daniel and Gudrun (Simon also offers to help out) | |
- | [Daniel and Gudrun (Simon also offers to help out)] | + |