User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:sm:photons

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/06/09 08:18]
suzanne.gasconshotkin
2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/07/14 08:28] (current)
philippe.gras Added instructions for CERN account
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Photon studies (isolation, fragmentation,​ resummation...) for direct photon measurements ====== ====== Photon studies (isolation, fragmentation,​ resummation...) for direct photon measurements ======
 +
 +//If you are interested in contributing please subscribe to the [[https://​e-groups.cern.ch/​e-groups/​EgroupsSearch.do?​searchValue=houches-2015-topics-sm-photon|mailing list]]. You will be asked to log in with your CERN account. If you don't have a CERN account, please fill [[https://​account.cern.ch/​account/​Externals/​RegisterAccount.aspx|this form]] to create a lightweight account.//
  
 still under construction still under construction
Line 19: Line 21:
 References for above presentations (to be completed): References for above presentations (to be completed):
   *Catani Fontannaz Guillet Pilon arXiv:​1306.6498 [hep-ph].   *Catani Fontannaz Guillet Pilon arXiv:​1306.6498 [hep-ph].
-  *T. Gehrmann, N. Greiner, and G. Heinrich, Photon isolation effects at NLO in gamma gamma + jet final states in hadronic collisions, JHEP 1306 (2013) 058, +  *T. Gehrmann, N. Greiner, and G. Heinrich, Photon isolation effects at NLO in gamma gamma + jet final states in hadronic collisions, JHEP 1306 (2013) 058,​arXiv:​1303.0824 [hep-ph].
-arXiv:​1303.0824 [hep-ph].+
  
  
Line 41: Line 42:
 2) Is unphysical behaviour under '​mismatch'​ of direct and frag component orders (as reported in LH2013 by Cieri and deFlorian) for gamma gamma, gamma gamma + jet and W/Zgamma also generalized to other processes? 2) Is unphysical behaviour under '​mismatch'​ of direct and frag component orders (as reported in LH2013 by Cieri and deFlorian) for gamma gamma, gamma gamma + jet and W/Zgamma also generalized to other processes?
  
---Gamma + jet with DIPHOX ​shown June 6 (Gudrun)[yes] (Is it possible to have '​LO-LO'​ to check?+--Gamma + jet with JETPHOX ​shown June 6 (Gudrun)[yes] (Is it possible to have '​LO ​fragmention function-LO matrix element' to check?) 
 + 
 +--LO fragmentation function possible in time horizon for proceedings (Jean-Philippe,​ Michel F.)?
  
  
 B) Fragmentation: ​ How important is the '​transverse'​ (or non-collinear) vs. '​longitudinal'​ (or collinear) fragmentation?​ B) Fragmentation: ​ How important is the '​transverse'​ (or non-collinear) vs. '​longitudinal'​ (or collinear) fragmentation?​
-FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM...) only have longitudinal,​ HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings),​ use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/​Fulvio,​ Ciaran et al, all) +FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM, GoSam, ​...) only have longitudinal,​ HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings),​ use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/​Fulvio,​ Ciaran et al, all) 
  
     ​     ​
Line 54: Line 57:
 2)Survey of direct photon measurements esp Vgamma ​ 2)Survey of direct photon measurements esp Vgamma ​
  
 +  * Discussion of what to include in a few slides for the summary session tomorrow
  
2015/groups/sm/photons.1433830739.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/06/09 08:18 by suzanne.gasconshotkin