User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:sm:photons

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/06/09 10:26]
suzanne.gasconshotkin
2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/06/09 11:58]
gudrun.heinrich
Line 46: Line 46:
  
 B) Fragmentation: ​ How important is the '​transverse'​ (or non-collinear) vs. '​longitudinal'​ (or collinear) fragmentation?​ B) Fragmentation: ​ How important is the '​transverse'​ (or non-collinear) vs. '​longitudinal'​ (or collinear) fragmentation?​
-FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM...) only have longitudinal,​ HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings),​ use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/​Fulvio,​ Ciaran et al, all) +FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM, GoSam, ​...) only have longitudinal,​ HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings),​ use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/​Fulvio,​ Ciaran et al, all) 
  
     ​     ​
2015/groups/sm/photons.txt ยท Last modified: 2015/07/14 08:28 by philippe.gras