Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/06/09 10:26]
suzanne.gasconshotkin
+++ 2015:groups:sm:photons [2015/07/06 12:01]
philippe.gras Moved to e-group mailing list
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Photon studies (isolation, fragmentation, resummation...) for direct photon measurements ======
+//If you are interested in contributing please subscribe to the [[https://e-groups.cern.ch/e-groups/EgroupsSearch.do?searchValue=houches-2015-topics-sm-photon|mailing list]].//
 still under construction
@@ Line 46: / Line 48: @@
 B) Fragmentation:  How important is the 'transverse' (or non-collinear) vs. 'longitudinal' (or collinear) fragmentation?
-FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM...) only have longitudinal, HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings), use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/Fulvio, Ciaran et al, all)
+FO calculators (e.g. PHOX family, MCFM, GoSam, ...) only have longitudinal, HO codes with PS (e.g. POWHEG with MiNLO) have both.  While waiting for gamma gamma in POWHEG with MiNLO (probably not for proceedings), use Vgamma (and maybe later Zgamma), MCFM vs. POWHEG + MiNLO, as 'test bench' to evaluate difference in integrated xs, differential observables and comparison with CMS/ATLAS data (Mauro/Fulvio, Ciaran et al, all)

Les Houches