This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 16:41] jesse.thaler [Supplemental Jet Shapes] |
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 16:51] jesse.thaler [What is the killer app of quark/gluon enrichment?] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
* Enhancing W/Z/t/H in moderately boosted regime (where we can quark-tag the subjets. | * Enhancing W/Z/t/H in moderately boosted regime (where we can quark-tag the subjets. | ||
+ | ==== Hemisphere quark/gluon definitions in e+e- ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Consider the case of e+ e- -> q qbar. Partition event into (thrust) hemisphere, define hemisphere flavor by summing over flavors of hemisphere constituents. | ||
+ | * At LO, we can unambiguously define hemisphere flavors. | ||
+ | * At NLO, we can also unambiguously define flavor via hemisphere, though there is now a small gluon fraction from gluon recoiling against q qbar pair. | ||
+ | * At NNLO, things are more complicated. | ||
+ | * Can have soft gluon splitting into q-qbar in different hemispheres, creates IRC safety issue. | ||
+ | * One can use a flavored algorithm (BSZ) to define the flavour of two flavor-kt jets | ||
+ | * Ultimately, want to define flavor by the Born-level operator contributing to the process. All subtleties are formally power suppressed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Flavored Jet Algorithms ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * This is a topic worthy of its own study. | ||
+ | * For pp collisions, multiple possible uses of flavored jet algorithms. | ||
+ | * One can just run flavor-kT | ||
+ | * Or one can run flavor-kT to define flavor ghosts, and run standard anti-kT. | ||
===== Physics Issues ===== | ===== Physics Issues ===== | ||