User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:sm:qg

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:02]
jesse.thaler
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:07]
jesse.thaler [Core Jet Shapes]
Line 125: Line 125:
   * Question: use ROC curves or mutual information (I(T;A)) to quantify discrimination power?   * Question: use ROC curves or mutual information (I(T;A)) to quantify discrimination power?
     * Answer: doesn'​t really matter, probably I(T;A) is easier to begin with.     * Answer: doesn'​t really matter, probably I(T;A) is easier to begin with.
 +    * Better answer: ​ Use separation (S-B)^2 / (2 (S + B)).
  
 ==== Core Jet Shapes ==== ==== Core Jet Shapes ====
Line 140: Line 141:
   * Question: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style)   * Question: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style)
     * Answer: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style)     * Answer: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style)
 +  * Question: ​ Plot linear or log scale?
 +    * Answer: ​ Do both if it makes sense, better for angularities to have log scale.
  
 ==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ==== ==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ====
Line 160: Line 163:
   * Rivet analysis in place which computes from a HepMC event sample the various generalised angularity distributions.   * Rivet analysis in place which computes from a HepMC event sample the various generalised angularity distributions.
  
 +==== Questions ====
  
 +  * Is discrimination power (e.g. for width) coming from the hadronization regime?
 +  * 
 ===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) ===== ===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) =====
  
2015/groups/sm/qg.txt ยท Last modified: 2015/07/14 08:27 by philippe.gras