User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:sm:qg

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:06]
jesse.thaler [Basic Plan]
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:11]
jesse.thaler [Questions]
Line 141: Line 141:
   * Question: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style)   * Question: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style)
     * Answer: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style)     * Answer: ​ Sum over particles (angularity-style)
 +  * Question: ​ Plot linear or log scale?
 +    * Answer: ​ Do both if it makes sense, better for angularities to have log scale.
  
 ==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ==== ==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ====
Line 164: Line 166:
  
   * Is discrimination power (e.g. for width) coming from the hadronization regime?   * Is discrimination power (e.g. for width) coming from the hadronization regime?
-  ​+    ​Possibility: ​ Isolate hadronization regime (thrust ~ LambdaQCD/​Q) and shower regime (thrust ~ 0.1-0.2) and optionally hard jet regime (thrust >~ 0.25). ​ Study scaling of, e.g., multiplicity as a function of Q in each of these regimes. 
 +  * By testing pythia vs. herwig, can we test string vs. cluster hadronization?​ 
 +  * Is there jet radius dependence?​ 
 +  * Does matching help in controlling quark/gluon uncertainties?​ 
 +  * Universality/​process dependence of conclusions?​ 
 +    * Related to whether the discrimination power comes from the core or the periphery of jet.
 ===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) ===== ===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) =====
  
2015/groups/sm/qg.txt · Last modified: 2015/07/14 08:27 by philippe.gras