This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:06] jesse.thaler [Basic Plan] |
2015:groups:sm:qg [2015/06/04 17:29] andrzej.siodmok |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Peter Loch <loch@physics.arizona.edu> | * Peter Loch <loch@physics.arizona.edu> | ||
* Deepak Kar | * Deepak Kar | ||
- | * Andrzej Siodmok | + | * Andrzej Siodmok <andrzej@cern.ch> |
* Peter Skands <peter.skands@monash.edu> | * Peter Skands <peter.skands@monash.edu> | ||
* Dave Soper | * Dave Soper | ||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
* Question: Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style) | * Question: Sum over particles (angularity-style) vs. sum over pairs (ECF-style) | ||
* Answer: Sum over particles (angularity-style) | * Answer: Sum over particles (angularity-style) | ||
+ | * Question: Plot linear or log scale? | ||
+ | * Answer: Do both if it makes sense, better for angularities to have log scale. | ||
==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ==== | ==== Supplemental Jet Shapes ==== | ||
Line 160: | Line 162: | ||
* Rivet analysis in place which computes from a HepMC event sample the various generalised angularity distributions. | * Rivet analysis in place which computes from a HepMC event sample the various generalised angularity distributions. | ||
+ | * Processes to consider: | ||
+ | * mu+mu- -> spin1 -> q qbar take photons | ||
+ | * mu+mu- -> spin0 -> g g take Higgs | ||
+ | * for tests of universality: mu+mu- -> spin0 -> q qbar | ||
+ | * Energies | ||
+ | * Q=sqrt{s} = 50, 200, 800 GeV | ||
+ | * Optionally: Q = 100, 400 GeV | ||
+ | * Jet definition: | ||
+ | * ee-antikt [genkt, p=-1], WTA_modp recomb scheme | ||
+ | * R = 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 | ||
+ | * Add thrust from thrust hemispheres for anticipated analytic comparisons | ||
+ | * Add multiplicity (event-wide) in bins of thrust: | ||
+ | * T < 5 GeV/sqrt(S) | ||
+ | * 5 GeV/sqrt(S) < T < 0.1 | ||
+ | * 0.1 < T < 0.2 | ||
+ | * 0.2 < T | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Preliminary plots for meeting on Thursday ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_20.pdf|}} | ||
+ | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_10.pdf|}} | ||
+ | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_05.pdf|}} | ||
+ | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_00_00.pdf|}} | ||
+ | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_20_00.pdf|}} | ||
==== Questions ==== | ==== Questions ==== | ||
* Is discrimination power (e.g. for width) coming from the hadronization regime? | * Is discrimination power (e.g. for width) coming from the hadronization regime? | ||
- | * | + | * Possibility: Isolate hadronization regime (thrust ~ LambdaQCD/Q) and shower regime (thrust ~ 0.1-0.2) and optionally hard jet regime (thrust >~ 0.25). Study scaling of, e.g., multiplicity as a function of Q in each of these regimes. |
+ | * By testing pythia vs. herwig, can we test string vs. cluster hadronization? | ||
+ | * Is there jet radius dependence? | ||
+ | * Does matching help in controlling quark/gluon uncertainties? | ||
+ | * Universality/process dependence of conclusions? | ||
+ | * Related to whether the discrimination power comes from the core or the periphery of jet. | ||
===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) ===== | ===== Next Les Houches Study (for after LH) ===== | ||
* Above study at hadron colliders, using dijets, W/Z/gamma + j, and maybe t tbar samples | * Above study at hadron colliders, using dijets, W/Z/gamma + j, and maybe t tbar samples | ||
- | ===== Preliminary plots for meeting on Thursday ===== | + | ===== Analytic Les Houches Study? ===== |
- | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_20.pdf|}} | + | * Analytic predictions known/available/straightforward for: |
- | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_10.pdf|}} | + | * Quark thrust: N^3LL' + N^3L0 |
- | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_10_05.pdf|}} | + | * Gluon thrust: N^2LL' + N^2L0 |
- | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_00_00.pdf|}} | + | * ang (kappa =1): NLL' |
- | {{:2015:groups:sm:ga_20_00.pdf|}} | + | * Can we do useful quark/gluon study from analytic results? |
===== Notes from Tuesday Meeting ===== | ===== Notes from Tuesday Meeting ===== |