This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2015:groups:tools:backgrounds [2015/06/03 17:54] jonathan.butterworth |
2015:groups:tools:backgrounds [2015/06/04 01:35] paolo.francavilla [WW versus ttbar] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
3. Consider WWbb as the signal, motivated by WWH (H->bb). Same study (DR/SR/C/Sum). | 3. Consider WWbb as the signal, motivated by WWH (H->bb). Same study (DR/SR/C/Sum). | ||
+ | For HH->WWbb, a possible proposal could be: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Objects Definition: | ||
+ | * electrons and muons: pT > 25 GeV; |eta| < 2.4 | ||
+ | * jets: pT > 25 GeV; | eta | <4.5 | ||
+ | * bjets: jets with | eta |< 2.5 and b-labelled | ||
+ | |||
+ | NOTE 1: in the ATLAS WW analysis, the jets are build from all the particles, excluding muons and neutrinos. | ||
+ | If we adopt this definition, we will need to run an Overlap Removal between electrons and jets, to avoid counting jets which are in fact electrons. | ||
+ | NOTE 2: The ATLAS WW analysis is vetoing events if (among the other selections) : | ||
+ | * there are jet (and b-jet), or | ||
+ | * there are extra leptons. | ||
+ | If we want to extend to events with b-jets, we should consider how to handle the semi-leptonic b-decays in jets ()to avoid to veto the event because of the leptons in jets. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Event Selection: | ||
+ | fill()CutFlow | ||
+ | * 2 opposite charged leptons | ||
+ | * 1 muon, 1 electron | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(MET_rel) | ||
+ | * MET_rel>25 GeV, | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(mll) | ||
+ | * mll>10 GeV, | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(b-jets, jets) #b-jets VS #jets | ||
+ | fill(jets), pt, eta | ||
+ | * 2+ bjets | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(bjet 1) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(bjet 2) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(electron) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(muon) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(MET) | ||
+ | fill(mT(MET,e,mu)) | ||
+ | * 100<mT(MET,e,mu)/GeV<150 | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(electron) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(muon) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(b-jet1) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(b-jet2) pt, eta | ||
+ | fill(m(bb)) | ||
+ | * 100<m(bb)/GeV<150 | ||
+ | fill(CutFlow) | ||
+ | fill(b-jets, jets) #b-jets VS #jets | ||
+ | fill(jets), pt, eta | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | NOTE: it would be nice to use some top veto. | ||
+ | the pseudo-top definition could be a nice idea, but it is defined | ||
+ | in a straightforward way for the Semi-leptonic channel. | ||
+ | One can test the b-lepton mass (associating the b to the closer lepton). | ||
+ | |||
Semi-leptonic channel: | Semi-leptonic channel: | ||
4. Consider ttbar as signal. Look at distortion in b-lepton mass from SR/C/Sum/WWbb-non-top contributions. | 4. Consider ttbar as signal. Look at distortion in b-lepton mass from SR/C/Sum/WWbb-non-top contributions. | ||
- | |||
==== Wb versus t ==== | ==== Wb versus t ==== | ||