User Tools

Site Tools


2015:groups:tools:backgrounds

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2015:groups:tools:backgrounds [2015/06/03 17:53]
jonathan.butterworth
2015:groups:tools:backgrounds [2015/07/14 08:31] (current)
philippe.gras Added instructions for CERN account
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== A quick study on the impact of irreducible-background subtraction ====== ====== A quick study on the impact of irreducible-background subtraction ======
  
 +//If you are interested in contributing please subscribe to the [[https://​e-groups.cern.ch/​e-groups/​EgroupsSearch.do?​searchValue=houches-2015-topics-tools-bgnd-subtraction|mailing list]]. You will be asked to log in with your CERN account. If you don't have a CERN account, please fill [[https://​account.cern.ch/​account/​Externals/​RegisterAccount.aspx|this form]] to create a lightweight account.//
  
- +Jon Butterworth, Vitaliano Ciulli, Paolo Francavilla,​ Frank Krauss, Carlo Pandini, Luca Parrozzi, ...
-Jon Butterworth,​ Paolo Francavilla,​ Frank Krauss, Carlo Pandini, Luca Parrozzi, ...+
  
 github repository: https://​github.com/​perrozzi/​leshouches_bkgsub github repository: https://​github.com/​perrozzi/​leshouches_bkgsub
Line 30: Line 30:
   * pT leptons all > 25 GeV   * pT leptons all > 25 GeV
   * |η| leptons all < 2.4   * |η| leptons all < 2.4
-  * count the jets, and b-jets with p > 25 GeV, rapidity |y| < 4.5  
   * m(ll′) > 10 GeV   * m(ll′) > 10 GeV
 +  * count the jets, and b-jets, with p > 25 GeV, rapidity |y| < 4.5 
  
 +... but I haven'​t check the CMS paper yet.
  
  
 3. Consider WWbb as the signal, motivated by WWH (H->bb). Same study (DR/​SR/​C/​Sum). 3. Consider WWbb as the signal, motivated by WWH (H->bb). Same study (DR/​SR/​C/​Sum).
 +For HH->​WWbb,​ a possible proposal could be:
 +
 +Objects Definition: ​
 +  * electrons and muons: pT > 25 GeV; |eta| < 2.4
 +  * jets: pT > 25 GeV; | eta | <4.5
 +  * bjets: jets with | eta |< 2.5 and b-labelled
 +
 +NOTE 1: in the ATLAS WW analysis, the jets are build from all the particles, excluding muons and neutrinos.
 +If we adopt this definition, we will need to run an Overlap Removal between electrons and jets, to avoid counting jets which are in fact electrons. ​
 +NOTE 2: The ATLAS WW analysis is vetoing events if (among the other selections) :
 +  * there are jet (and b-jet), or
 +  * there are extra leptons.
 +If we want to extend to events with b-jets, we should consider how to handle the semi-leptonic b-decays in jets ()to avoid to veto the event because of the leptons in jets. 
 +
 +Event Selection:
 +fill()CutFlow
 +  * 2 opposite charged leptons
 +  * 1 muon, 1 electron
 +fill(CutFlow)
 +fill(MET_rel)
 +  * MET_rel>​25 GeV,
 +fill(CutFlow) ​
 +fill(mll)
 +  * mll>10 GeV, 
 +fill(CutFlow)
 +fill(b-jets,​ jets) #b-jets VS #jets
 +fill(jets), pt, eta
 +  * 2+ bjets
 +fill(CutFlow)
 +fill(bjet 1) pt, eta
 +fill(bjet 2) pt, eta
 +fill(electron) pt, eta
 +fill(muon) pt, eta
 +fill(MET) ​
 +fill(mT(MET,​e,​mu)) ​
 +  * 100<​mT(MET,​e,​mu)/​GeV<​150
 +fill(CutFlow)
 +fill(electron) pt, eta
 +fill(muon) pt, eta
 +fill(b-jet1) pt, eta
 +fill(b-jet2) pt, eta
 +fill(m(bb))
 +  * 100<​m(bb)/​GeV<​150
 +fill(CutFlow)
 +fill(b-jets,​ jets) #b-jets VS #jets
 +fill(jets), pt, eta
 +
 +
 +NOTE: it would be nice to use some top veto.
 +the pseudo-top definition could be a nice idea, but it is defined ​
 +in a straightforward way for the Semi-leptonic channel.
 +One can test the b-lepton mass (associating the b to the closer lepton).
 +
  
 Semi-leptonic channel: Semi-leptonic channel:
  
 4. Consider ttbar as signal. Look at distortion in b-lepton mass from SR/​C/​Sum/​WWbb-non-top contributions. 4. Consider ttbar as signal. Look at distortion in b-lepton mass from SR/​C/​Sum/​WWbb-non-top contributions.
- 
 ==== Wb versus t ==== ==== Wb versus t ====
  
2015/groups/tools/backgrounds.1433346801.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/06/03 17:53 by jonathan.butterworth