2015:groups:tools:showeruncertainties
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
2015:groups:tools:showeruncertainties [2015/06/04 16:35] simon.pltzer created |
2015:groups:tools:showeruncertainties [2015/09/20 22:25] (current) marek.schoenherr [Work Plan] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Shower Uncertainties ====== | ====== Shower Uncertainties ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | //If you are interested in contributing please subscribe to the [[https://e-groups.cern.ch/e-groups/EgroupsSearch.do?searchValue=houches-2015-topics-tools-ps-and-matching-unc|mailing list]]. You will be asked to log in with your CERN account. If you don't have a CERN account, please fill [[https://account.cern.ch/account/Externals/RegisterAccount.aspx|this form]] to create a lightweight account.// | ||
| ==== Overview ==== | ==== Overview ==== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
| The basic ida is to first do a study on the purely pQCD level. Different shower algorithms should be compared at LO+PS level first, along with their recommended variations. | The basic ida is to first do a study on the purely pQCD level. Different shower algorithms should be compared at LO+PS level first, along with their recommended variations. | ||
| - | Having cross-validated these uncertainties between different algorithms, matching/merging approaches should be included and an assesment on accuracy improvements should be made, again cross-validating different alggorithms. | + | Having cross-validated these uncertainties between different algorithms, matching/merging approaches should be included and an assessment on accuracy improvements should be made, again cross-validating different algorithms. |
| - | A comparison to analytic resummation (where possible) and at different levels of perturbative accuracy is desireable. The range of observables should be kept small and concise, ranging from quantities which exhibit resummation, transition and fixed order regions, but also including these observables, where shower uncertainties are expected to indicate large hadronization corrections, as well. | + | A comparison to analytic resummation (where possible) and at different levels of perturbative accuracy is desirable. The range of observables should be kept small and concise, ranging from quantities which exhibit resummation, transition and fixed order regions, but also including these observables, where shower uncertainties are expected to indicate large hadronization corrections, as well. |
| A preliminary list includes: | A preliminary list includes: | ||
| Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
| * Generators/analytics groups interested should sign up on this page, providing a list of input they can/will provide. | * Generators/analytics groups interested should sign up on this page, providing a list of input they can/will provide. | ||
| + | == Proposal == | ||
| + | * Use the Rivet ALEPH_2004_S5765862 analysis for e+e- as it contains all observables discussed and start with that. Once a preliminary comparison is available we can move to pp->h/Z etc. | ||
2015/groups/tools/showeruncertainties.1433428529.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2015/06/04 16:35 by simon.pltzer
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
