This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2017:groups:higgs:2h [2017/06/17 15:37] jose_miguel.no |
2017:groups:higgs:2h [2017/06/19 13:45] jeremie.quevillon |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Interested people: Jose Miguel No, Jose Zurita, | + | ====== Higgs Self Coupling and di-Higgs ====== |
- | 1. V phi, with phi -> gamma gamma, what does the LHC can say? | ||
- | bounds from LEP. what is the LHC capability? | + | Interested people: Fabio Maltoni, Minho Son, José Zurita, Benjamin Fuks, Ramona Groeber, Alexandra Carvalho, Jérémie Quevillon ... |
- | bounds from H coupling measurements to ZZ and EWPT | + | Kick-off discussion Mon 16.30-17.30 QCD |
+ | Discussion points that came up on Thursday: | ||
+ | 1.) Reinterpretation of resonant search | ||
+ | 2.) EFT Di-Higgs | ||
+ | 3.) Interference | ||
+ | Further possible discussion points for the kick-off meeting: | ||
+ | 1.) status what kind of analysis ongoing? | ||
+ | 2.) resonant production searches at the moment in terms of benchmarks, how to benchmark, generalisation, interference? | ||
+ | 3.) combination different final states | ||
+ | 4.) Scenarios that allow us to observe new physics for first time in HH production? | ||
+ | 5.) in EFT analysis BR remain SM-like, can be improved on that? | ||
+ | 6.) larger bounds on trilinear Higgs self-coupling can be usually obtained in negative range, but most models have positive deviation, which models have negative deviation? | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 2. Complementarity with phi single production together with a ISR | ||
- | |||
- | Light scalars (m_{phi} < m_h = 125 GeV) with no phi V V coupling (V = SM gauge boson) but coupling to fermions. Motivated in extended Higgs sectors (e.g. light Higgses in 2HDM) when the 125 GeV is SM like (2HDM "alignment limit"). | ||
- | |||
- | Weakly constrained by LEP (no V phi production). Maybe challenging @ LHC? phi recoiling against a hard jet could allow to trigger on this (phi -> gamma gamma? tau tau?). | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 3. Exotic Higgs decays: What are the holes? | ||
- | |||
- | h -> a a, Z a, a a' with a, a' scalar/pseudoscalar (for Z a, a is pseudoscalar) | ||
- | |||
- | * Current searches for h -> a a: 4 muon, 2 mu 2 b, 4 tau, 2 tau 2 mu, 4 b... | ||
- | * Interesting to look at signatures with resolved/not resolved photons: 2b 2gamma, 4 gamma (for unresolved 2 gamma pairs, measurement of h->gamma gamma could yield weak constraint) | ||
- | * h -> Z a (a -> gamma gamma) has been initially studied by Bauer, Neubert, Thamm in [[http://example.com|https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.08207]], for a being an ALP (axion-like particle) | ||
- | * h -> a a': if ma is different from ma', h -> a a searches would miss it (also depends on final state) | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | h->chi1 chi2 | ||
- | |||
- | h->ss->SM (eventually scalars with different masses h-> s1s2) | ||
- | what are the holes? | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | * decays involving missing energy: h->chi1 chi2 with chi1 invisible | ||
- | |||
- | * s with displaced decays. Role of the LHCb | ||