This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2017:groups:higgs:lsp [2017/06/20 15:43] haiying.cai |
2017:groups:higgs:lsp [2017/10/01 11:20] (current) jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | __Interested people:__ //Jose Miguel No, Jose Zurita, Stefania Gori, Ken Mimasu, Linda Finco, Sijing Zhang, Susan Gascon-Shotkin, Grégory Moreau, Haiying Cai, Sylvain Fichet, Thomas Flacke, Stefan Liebler, // | + | __Interested people:__ //Jose Miguel No, Jose Zurita, Stefania Gori, Ken Mimasu, Linda Finco, Sijing Zhang, Susan Gascon-Shotkin, Grégory Moreau, Haiying Cai, Sylvain Fichet, Thomas Flacke, Stefan Liebler, Daniele Barducci, Andrei Angelescu, Jon Butterworth// |
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Looking at scalar couplings to fermions, other production and decay modes (ϕ→ττ or ϕ→bˉb [reconstructing the invariant scalar mass]) could be studied as well. | Looking at scalar couplings to fermions, other production and decay modes (ϕ→ττ or ϕ→bˉb [reconstructing the invariant scalar mass]) could be studied as well. | ||
- | Gauge invariant (pseudo-)scalar couplings to ZZ, WW, γγ, γZ, gluon-gluon: $$\frac{\phi}{\Lambda_1}\vert D_\mu H\vert^2 \ \ (for \ scalars \ only) \ \ and \ \ \frac{\phi}{\Lambda_2} Tr[V_{\mu\nu} \tilde V^{\mu\nu}] \ .$$ | + | Gauge invariant (pseudo-)scalar couplings to ZZ, WW, γγ, γZ, gluon-gluon: $$\frac{\phi}{f_H}\vert D_\mu H\vert^2 |
+ | \ , \ \ \frac{\phi}{f_Z} Tr[V_{\mu\nu} V^{\mu\nu}] | ||
+ | \ \ and \ \ \frac{\phi}{\tilde f_Z} Tr[V_{\mu\nu} \tilde V^{\mu\nu}] \ .$$ | ||
Two other effective parameters: ϕ mass (mϕ) and Branching for ϕ→γγ (Bγ). | Two other effective parameters: ϕ mass (mϕ) and Branching for ϕ→γγ (Bγ). | ||
Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
(2) produce kinematical distributions for the signal with MadGRAPH (directly from the LHE files with madAnalysis for example) | (2) produce kinematical distributions for the signal with MadGRAPH (directly from the LHE files with madAnalysis for example) | ||
(3) interface the DELPHES detector response simulator (at the MadGRAPH level) | (3) interface the DELPHES detector response simulator (at the MadGRAPH level) | ||
- | (4) compare distributions for SM-like couplings ($1/\Lambda_1)andkinetic−likecouplings(1/\Lambda_2$) [also to develop a discrimination test between e.g. a light Higgs and a radion] | + | (4) compare distributions for SM-like couplings ($1/f_H$) and kinetic-like couplings (1/f_Z, $1/\tilde f_Z$) [also to develop a discrimination test between e.g. a light Higgs and a radion] |
(5) simulate SM background events as well (main physical one: Drell-Yan + double ISR/FSR ?) | (5) simulate SM background events as well (main physical one: Drell-Yan + double ISR/FSR ?) | ||
(6) optimise a set of selection cuts | (6) optimise a set of selection cuts | ||
- | (7) obtain a sensitivity plot (prospective for Run 2) in the 3-dimension parameter space: m_\phi, $1/\Lambda_1, 1/\Lambda_2 [=couplings for the considered gauge bosons] for B_\gamma=100% (plot to be simply rescaled accordingly to the wanted B_\gamma$ value then). (+motivate EXP analysis of exclusion limits from Run 1 data?). | + | (7) obtain a sensitivity plot (prospective for Run 2) in the parameter space: m_\phi, $1/f_H, 1/f_Z, 1/\tilde f_Z [=couplings for the considered gauge bosons] for B_\gamma=100% (plot to be simply rescaled accordingly to the wanted B_\gamma$ value then). (+motivate EXP analysis of exclusion limits from Run 1 data?). |
Goal: derive a generic plot that can be recast to any specific theoretical scenario with a light (pseudo-)scalar, and, determine its complementarity with LEP(,EWPT) bounds. | Goal: derive a generic plot that can be recast to any specific theoretical scenario with a light (pseudo-)scalar, and, determine its complementarity with LEP(,EWPT) bounds. | ||
+ | Tools: Some of us are looking at this using [[2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles|Contur]]. | ||