User Tools

Site Tools


2017:groups:np:nonthermal

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2017:groups:np:nonthermal [2017/06/21 11:16]
gabriel.facini
2017:groups:np:nonthermal [2017/09/29 15:16]
jose_miguel.no
Line 1: Line 1:
-People interested: Bryan Zaldivar, José Zurita, Jérémie Quevillon, Jose Miguel No, Nishita Desai, Julia Harz, Daniele Barducci, Dipan Sengupta, Haiying Cai, Felix Bruemmer, Andreas Goudelis, Gabriel Facini+People interested: Bryan Zaldivar, José Zurita, Jérémie Quevillon, Jose Miguel No, Nishita Desai, Julia Harz, Daniele Barducci, Dipan Sengupta ​(dipan@pa.msu.edu), Haiying Cai, Felix Bruemmer, Andreas Goudelis, Gabriel Facini, Sezen Sekmen
  
 Understand the connection between freeze-in models and LLP signatures at the LHC. Is it a generic feature of freeze-in models? ​ Understand the connection between freeze-in models and LLP signatures at the LHC. Is it a generic feature of freeze-in models? ​
 +
 +* TODO-list + description + volunteers: {{ :​2017:​groups:​np:​todo.pdf |}}
  
  
Line 7: Line 9:
   - Original freeze-in paper: Hall, Jedamzik, John March-Russell,​ West [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​0911.1120 | arXiv ]]   - Original freeze-in paper: Hall, Jedamzik, John March-Russell,​ West [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​0911.1120 | arXiv ]]
   - LLP signatures: Co, D'​Eramo,​ Hall, Pappadopulo [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1506.07532 |arxiv]] ​   - LLP signatures: Co, D'​Eramo,​ Hall, Pappadopulo [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1506.07532 |arxiv]] ​
 +  - A concrete realization of the FIMP with LLPs @ LHC, and yielding a standard cosmological history, which turns out to be complementary in DM mass range to the one we have been discussed so far: [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1405.1259 |arxiv]] [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1611.09540 |arxiv]] ​
 +  - A second realization of non-thermal DM and LLPs (appearing today) [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1706.06815.pdf]]
 +  - MATHUSLA original paper: Chou, Curtin, Lubatti ​ [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1606.06298 |arxiv]]
 +  - MATHUSLA measurements : Curtin, Peskin [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1705.06327 |arxiv]]
 +  - BBN constraints:​ Fradette, Pospelov [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1706.01920 | arxiv]]
  
 Deliverables:​ Deliverables:​
  
-- A minimal UFO model implementing the idea (YMMV!) [[https://​www.dropbox.com/​s/​088u4g1nj282ows/​FIMP_LH.zip?​dl=0|External Link]]+- A minimal UFO model implementing the idea (YMMV!) [[https://​www.dropbox.com/​s/​088u4g1nj282ows/​FIMP_LH.zip?​dl=0|External Link]] ​-> cross section of 0.687 fb for the reference point shown in the FIMP note. For the specific final states: (+,​0),​(+,​-),​(-,​0),​(0,​0) = 0.341,​0.122,​0.113,​0.111.
  
 - Mathematica Notebook (or similar) calculating input parameters (TBD). - Mathematica Notebook (or similar) calculating input parameters (TBD).
  
 - Note on "FIMP production via decay" by Bryan {{ :​2017:​groups:​np:​boltzmann_fimp.pdf |}} - Note on "FIMP production via decay" by Bryan {{ :​2017:​groups:​np:​boltzmann_fimp.pdf |}}
 +
 +- Note on the numerical solution and a comparison with the analytical formulae {{ :​2017:​groups:​np:​boltzmann_numerical.pdf ​ |}}
 +
 +- Notes on the classification of signatures for freeze-in according to the quantum numbers of parent particle (and SM decay product) {{ :​2017:​groups:​np:​FIMP_classification.pdf |}}
 +
 +Triggers (ATLAS):
 +There was some discussion as to what triggers are possible for displaced leptons. ​
 +  - This talk from the LLP workshop has some hand drawn plots outlining the trigger possibilities in each region (pg 7-8) https://​indico.cern.ch/​event/​607314/​contributions/​2542332/​attachments/​1449594/​2234900/​LLP_trigger_discussion_group_summary_26april2017.key.pdf It is a bit annoying to read but it is public :p. 
 +  - For muons you can go all the way out to the MS while prompt muon triggers pick decays out to 1 cm with pT~20 GeV (this is for your general consideration,​ don't quote that in a paper, please)
 +  - For electrons, there is no explicit d0 cut in the trigger, but I am trying to find out if there are hit level requirements such as requiring a hit on the first tracking layer which might limit the acceptance.
2017/groups/np/nonthermal.txt · Last modified: 2017/09/29 15:19 by jose_miguel.no