This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2017:groups:tools:contur [2017/09/20 23:15] jonathan.butterworth [Light Scalar Particles] |
2017:groups:tools:contur [2017/09/20 23:38] jonathan.butterworth [Light Scalar Particles] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
{{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_.png?400|}} | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_.png?400|}} | ||
- | ... so this is looking pretty promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course... | + | ... so this is looking pretty promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course. All the yellow region above is excluded by the ATLAS diphoton cross sections: [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1591327|arXiv:1704.03839]]. If those are not included, the [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1448301|ATLAS $Z+\gamma$ measurements]] (in dilepton+photon and MET+photon) have quite some power on their own, see below. |
+ | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_zg.png?400|}} | ||
+ | Z+photon | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_metg.png?400|}} | ||
+ | Missing ET + photon | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remember, big caveat on this is that the data is assumed to exactly agree with the SM, which means (given we only really know that these data are //consistent// with the SM) that we are neglected the SM theory uncertainties. | ||
== Older Stuff == | == Older Stuff == |