This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2017:groups:tools:contur [2017/09/20 23:29] jonathan.butterworth [Light Scalar Particles] |
2017:groups:tools:contur [2017/09/21 10:24] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[contur#2HDM Studies|2HDM Studies]] | * [[contur#2HDM Studies|2HDM Studies]] | ||
* [[2017:groups:higgs:fxsnp:susycascades|FXS: Higgs production from SUSY cascades]] | * [[2017:groups:higgs:fxsnp:susycascades|FXS: Higgs production from SUSY cascades]] | ||
- | * [[contur#Light Scalar Particles|Light Scalar Particles]] | + | * [[Contur for Light Scalar Particles]] |
* [[Explanation of Contur plot format]] | * [[Explanation of Contur plot format]] | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
{{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_.png?400|}} | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_.png?400|}} | ||
- | ... so this is looking pretty promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course. All the yellow region above is excluded by the ATLAS diphoton cross sections: [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1591327|arXiv:1704.03839]]. If those are not included, the [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1448301|ATLAS $Z+\gamma$ meaurements]] (in the dilepton+photon and MET+photon) measurements have quite some power on their own, see below. | + | ... so this is looking pretty promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course. All the yellow region above is excluded by the ATLAS diphoton cross sections: [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1591327|arXiv:1704.03839]]. If those are not included, the [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1448301|ATLAS $Z+\gamma$ measurements]] (in dilepton+photon and MET+photon) have quite some power on their own, see below. |
{{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_zg.png?400|}} | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_zg.png?400|}} | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
Missing ET + photon | Missing ET + photon | ||
+ | Remember, big caveat on this is that the data is assumed to exactly agree with the SM, which means (given we only really know that these data are //consistent// with the SM) that we are neglected the SM theory uncertainties. | ||
== Older Stuff == | == Older Stuff == |