This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 10:36] jonathan.butterworth |
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 10:58] jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
... so this looks promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course - see below. Basically all the yellow region above is excluded by the ATLAS diphoton cross sections: [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1591327|arXiv:1704.03839]]. If those are not included, the [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1448301|ATLAS $Z+\gamma$ measurements]] (in dilepton+photon and MET+photon) have quite some power on their own, see below. | ... so this looks promising. Everything excluded except the lowest mass/highest scale. This needs to be carefully checked, of course - see below. Basically all the yellow region above is excluded by the ATLAS diphoton cross sections: [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1591327|arXiv:1704.03839]]. If those are not included, the [[http://inspirehep.net/record/1448301|ATLAS $Z+\gamma$ measurements]] (in dilepton+photon and MET+photon) have quite some power on their own, see below. | ||
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_zg.png?200|}} $l^+l^- + \gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nso.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ |
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_metg.png?200|}} | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nso.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ |
- | Missing ET + $\gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nso.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons |
Here are the plots from some of the points on the grid. (See [[http://contur.hepforge.org/share/plot-format.html|here]] for an explanation of the plot format.) | Here are the plots from some of the points on the grid. (See [[http://contur.hepforge.org/share/plot-format.html|here]] for an explanation of the plot format.) | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
A similar run for the CP-even scalar model, using the parameters sugested by Sylvain, gives the heatmap below: | A similar run for the CP-even scalar model, using the parameters sugested by Sylvain, gives the heatmap below: | ||
- | |||
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:combinedcl_8cpe.png?300|}} {{:2017:groups:tools:contur_8cpe.png?300|}}. | ||
{{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78cpe.png?300|}}{{:2017:groups:tools:contur_78cpe.png?300|}} | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78cpe.png?300|}}{{:2017:groups:tools:contur_78cpe.png?300|}} | ||
Line 76: | Line 74: | ||
This is 7 and 8 TeV only, but the currently available 13 TeV results have no real impact as there are no photon measurements in Rivet yet. Again, the inclusive diphotons and the Z+jet results both have significant sensitivity. | This is 7 and 8 TeV only, but the currently available 13 TeV results have no real impact as there are no photon measurements in Rivet yet. Again, the inclusive diphotons and the Z+jet results both have significant sensitivity. | ||
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8cpe_zg.png?200|}} $l^+l^- + \gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78wzg_nse.png?200|}} $(l^+l^-)$ or $(l + E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ |
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8nse_metg.png?200|}} MET + $\gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8metg_nse.png?200|}} $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ |
- | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_8nse_photon.png?200|}} $\gamma\gamma$ | + | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nse.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons |
Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced. Cause to be investigated. The 7 TeV inclusive photon results are needed to fill in the lower left corner. | Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced. Cause to be investigated. The 7 TeV inclusive photon results are needed to fill in the lower left corner. |