2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 11:04] jonathan.butterworth |
2017:groups:tools:contur_for_light_scalar_particles [2017/10/01 11:05] jonathan.butterworth |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nse.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | {{:2017:groups:tools:cl_78photons_nse.png?200|}} Inclusive and di-photons | ||
| - | Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss}) + \gamma$ channel. | + | Note that the sensitivity at low $M_\phi$ and $\Lambda$ is somewhat reduced, especially for the $E_T^{\rm miss} + \gamma$ channel. Presumably something to do with the angular distributions of the decay photons of the $\phi$, but to be studied... |
| - | Remember, big caveat on all this is the standard Contur assumption (at the moment) that the data exactly agree with the SM, which means (given we only really know that these data are //consistent// with the SM) that we are neglecting the SM theory uncertainties. | + | |
| + | // Remember, big caveat on all this is the standard Contur assumption (at the moment) that the data exactly agree with the SM, which means (given we only really know that these data are //consistent// with the SM) that we are neglecting the SM theory uncertainties. // | ||
2017/groups/tools/contur_for_light_scalar_particles.txt · Last modified: 2017/10/11 23:47 by jonathan.butterworth
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
