User Tools

Site Tools


2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/12 19:10]
emanuele.re
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/12 19:27]
emanuele.re
Line 36: Line 36:
        * It might even be possible to use the powheg reweighting machinery to avoid having to re-run all the grids. This might depend on how far mtop is moved from the central value. T. Jezo and collaborators have tried this. Perhaps it'd be useful to perform a closure-test,​ but using the outermost mtop values that atlas/cms would use.        * It might even be possible to use the powheg reweighting machinery to avoid having to re-run all the grids. This might depend on how far mtop is moved from the central value. T. Jezo and collaborators have tried this. Perhaps it'd be useful to perform a closure-test,​ but using the outermost mtop values that atlas/cms would use.
  
-       * this reweighting would be missing mtop dependence in R/B+       * this reweighting would be missing mtop dependence in R/B. There exists an experimental facility in powheg, to capture these effects via a reweighting,​ but it was implemented only for DY, and rarely used. Not clear it would work here. 
 + 
 +[ER: to be continued] 
 + 
  
  
2017/groups/tools/resonance_aware.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/15 14:02 by emanuele.re