User Tools

Site Tools


2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/12 19:04]
emanuele.re
2017:groups:tools:resonance_aware [2017/06/15 14:00]
emanuele.re
Line 22: Line 22:
      * comparison powheg vs mc@nlo (any news from herwig, or sherpa?)      * comparison powheg vs mc@nlo (any news from herwig, or sherpa?)
  
-Discussion on Monday:+------------ 
 + 
 +**Discussion on Monday:** 
 + 
 +overview: {{:​2017:​2017_06_12.pdf |slides }} 
 + 
 +ATLAS perspective:​ slides
  
 technicalities (bb4l generator): technicalities (bb4l generator):
Line 28: Line 34:
    * make sure that numerical accuracy reached in event generation from MC is the same as in TH-paper    * make sure that numerical accuracy reached in event generation from MC is the same as in TH-paper
  
-       * possible to have grids from the authors (seems to be a viable solution, as atlas and cms will agree - or already agreed - on the settings+       * possible to have grids from the authors (seems to be a viable solution, as atlas and cms will agree - or already agreed - on the settings)
  
        * if grids will be provided, need to agree on parameters to scan upon. It seems that order 20 runs will  be enough (a scan would mostly be done using 5-10 values for mtop, and 2-3 values for hdamp)        * if grids will be provided, need to agree on parameters to scan upon. It seems that order 20 runs will  be enough (a scan would mostly be done using 5-10 values for mtop, and 2-3 values for hdamp)
  
-       ​* ​+       ​* ​It might even be possible to use the powheg reweighting machinery to avoid having to re-run all the grids. This might depend on how far mtop is moved from the central value. T. Jezo and collaborators have tried this. Perhaps it'd be useful to perform a closure-test,​ but using the outermost mtop values that atlas/cms would use. 
 + 
 +       * this reweighting would miss the mtop dependence in R/B. There exists an experimental facility in powheg, to capture these effects via a reweighting,​ but it was implemented only for DY, and rarely used. Not clear it would work here. 
 + 
 +[ER: to be continued] 
 + 
  
  
2017/groups/tools/resonance_aware.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/15 14:02 by emanuele.re