User Tools

Site Tools


2017:working_groups:ew

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2017:working_groups:ew [2017/06/12 16:23]
marek.schoenherr
2017:working_groups:ew [2017/06/13 10:28]
stefan.kallweit
Line 10: Line 10:
      * Recola (<​private MC>/​Sherpa+Recola)      * Recola (<​private MC>/​Sherpa+Recola)
      * ... (?)      * ... (?)
-Another technical comparison is for sure doable, but we should discuss if this would be helpful (maybe in the EW session on Tuesday morning). In last year's proceedings,​ the plan was that each group would try to reproduce the results of the respective other groups (Recola, OpenLops, MG5_aMC@NLO),​ but finally essentially only Munich/​Sherpa+OpenLoops provided anything beyond what was already available from their papers...+Another technical comparison is for sure doable, but we should discuss if this would be helpful (maybe in the EW session on Tuesday morning). In last year's proceedings,​ the plan was that each group would try to reproduce the results of the respective other groups (Recola, OpenLops, MG5_aMC@NLO),​ but finally essentially only Munich/​Sherpa+OpenLoops provided anything beyond what was already available from their papers... Probably no purely technical comparison between codes (maybe as a by-product of other studies).
  
- ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Hua-Sheng Shao+ ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Hua-Sheng Shao, Mathieu Pellen
  
  
Line 27: Line 27:
  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr
  
-Rather than a bare theoretical comparison of different tools we could investigate the impact of "​democratic clustering"​ against other possible prescriptions,​ e.g. on some sample process like V+1,2jets.+Rather than a bare theoretical comparison of different tools we could investigate the impact of "​democratic clustering"​ against other possible prescriptions,​ e.g. on some sample process like di-jetW(->​lnu))+jet (or even W(->​lnu)+2jets).
  
- ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr+ ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr, Mathieu Pellen
  
 +Comparison of different pseudo-resonance treatments in case no complex-mass scheme is applied because of external vector-boson treatment as stable: W+2jets (stable W boson) should used as a case study. (The motivation is that processes of interest might be too complicated to be calculated with full decays at some point, and W+2jets might be one of the simplest processes where the problem can be investigated.)
  
 + ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit
2017/working_groups/ew.txt ยท Last modified: 2017/11/10 18:09 by mathieu.pellen