User Tools

Site Tools


2017:working_groups:ew

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2017:working_groups:ew [2017/06/13 10:09]
mathieu.pellen
2017:working_groups:ew [2017/06/13 10:28]
stefan.kallweit
Line 10: Line 10:
      * Recola (<​private MC>/​Sherpa+Recola)      * Recola (<​private MC>/​Sherpa+Recola)
      * ... (?)      * ... (?)
-Another technical comparison is for sure doable, but we should discuss if this would be helpful (maybe in the EW session on Tuesday morning). In last year's proceedings,​ the plan was that each group would try to reproduce the results of the respective other groups (Recola, OpenLops, MG5_aMC@NLO),​ but finally essentially only Munich/​Sherpa+OpenLoops provided anything beyond what was already available from their papers...+Another technical comparison is for sure doable, but we should discuss if this would be helpful (maybe in the EW session on Tuesday morning). In last year's proceedings,​ the plan was that each group would try to reproduce the results of the respective other groups (Recola, OpenLops, MG5_aMC@NLO),​ but finally essentially only Munich/​Sherpa+OpenLoops provided anything beyond what was already available from their papers... Probably no purely technical comparison between codes (maybe as a by-product of other studies).
  
  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Hua-Sheng Shao, Mathieu Pellen  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Hua-Sheng Shao, Mathieu Pellen
Line 27: Line 27:
  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr
  
-Rather than a bare theoretical comparison of different tools we could investigate the impact of "​democratic clustering"​ against other possible prescriptions,​ e.g. on some sample process like V+1,2jets.+Rather than a bare theoretical comparison of different tools we could investigate the impact of "​democratic clustering"​ against other possible prescriptions,​ e.g. on some sample process like di-jetW(->​lnu))+jet (or even W(->​lnu)+2jets).
  
  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr, Mathieu Pellen  ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit, Marek Schoenherr, Mathieu Pellen
  
 +Comparison of different pseudo-resonance treatments in case no complex-mass scheme is applied because of external vector-boson treatment as stable: W+2jets (stable W boson) should used as a case study. (The motivation is that processes of interest might be too complicated to be calculated with full decays at some point, and W+2jets might be one of the simplest processes where the problem can be investigated.)
  
 + ​**contributors:​** Stefan Kallweit
2017/working_groups/ew.txt ยท Last modified: 2017/11/10 18:09 by mathieu.pellen