2019:groups:bsm:bdm
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:bsm:bdm [2019/06/25 16:50] jan.heisig |
2019:groups:bsm:bdm [2019/07/23 15:58] jose.zurita |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| **Project Acronym: BDM** | **Project Acronym: BDM** | ||
| - | **Interested people**: Hua-Sheng Shao, Benjamin Fuks, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Dipan Sengupta, Nishita Desai, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jan Heisig, Priscilla Pani, Andre Lessa, Sezen Sekmen. | + | **Interested people (during LH)**: Hua-Sheng Shao, Benjamin Fuks, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Dipan Sengupta, Nishita Desai, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jan Heisig, Priscilla Pani, Andre Lessa, Sezen Sekmen, Juhi Dutta |
| - | + | ||
| - | [Please add your name and feel free to edit tasks!] | + | |
| **Goal** : study if it's possible to tag SM hadrons (b's going to B's which in turn decay to J/psi's etc) in dark matter long-lived particle searches, when the mass splitting between the parent particle and dark matter is relatively small (< 35 GeV or so). | **Goal** : study if it's possible to tag SM hadrons (b's going to B's which in turn decay to J/psi's etc) in dark matter long-lived particle searches, when the mass splitting between the parent particle and dark matter is relatively small (< 35 GeV or so). | ||
| Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
| 2) Decide on a concrete model and delineate the cosmologically interesting parameter space (from conversion-driven freeze-out, freeze-in etc). Candidate model exists, with a sbottom-like parent decaying into a neutralino-like dark matter + a bottom quark. | 2) Decide on a concrete model and delineate the cosmologically interesting parameter space (from conversion-driven freeze-out, freeze-in etc). Candidate model exists, with a sbottom-like parent decaying into a neutralino-like dark matter + a bottom quark. | ||
| - | 3) Generate the signal | + | 3) Generate the signal [UFO model is here + FR file in] |
| + | |||
| + | https://phystev.cnrs.fr/wiki/_media/2019:groups:bsm:bdm:sbottom_ufo_model_fr.zip | ||
| + | |||
| + | (from Jan: "MG gives me an error on hypercharge violation, should be checked"). | ||
| 4) Investigate how to improve S/B (e.g. Br(B->l v)=10%, a third lepton veto, B is displaced in signal but not in background etc). | 4) Investigate how to improve S/B (e.g. Br(B->l v)=10%, a third lepton veto, B is displaced in signal but not in background etc). | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
| * [[2019:groups:bsm:bdm:DVresults|Results for the ATLAS DV+MET analysis]] | * [[2019:groups:bsm:bdm:DVresults|Results for the ATLAS DV+MET analysis]] | ||
| + | |||
| **List of possible benchmarks** | **List of possible benchmarks** | ||
| - | The following points all give you the right relic density in CDFO: | + | The following parameter points in the "sbottom-neutralino"-simplified model considered in 1705.09292 give you the right relic density via CDFO: |
| ^ m_DM[GeV] ^ m_sbot[GeV] ^ \lambda ^ ctau[m] ^ | ^ m_DM[GeV] ^ m_sbot[GeV] ^ \lambda ^ ctau[m] ^ | ||
| Line 37: | Line 40: | ||
| | 1000 | 1020 | 4.8e-7 | 0.03 | | | 1000 | 1020 | 4.8e-7 | 0.03 | | ||
| | 1000 | 1030 | 9.7e-6 | 0.003 | | | 1000 | 1030 | 9.7e-6 | 0.003 | | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[2019:groups:bsm:bdm:cdfo_sbot_scan_1705_09292.txt| Complete list of points can be seen here ]] | ||
| + | * [[2019:groups:bsm:bdm:Rhadronlimits| Reinterpreted limits from R-hadron searches (CMS) can be seen here ]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * [[2019:groups:bsm:bdm:ToDos| Current Tasks ]] | ||
2019/groups/bsm/bdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/07/23 16:00 by jose.zurita
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
