2019:groups:bsm:rdm
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/23 15:39] benjamin.fuks FeynRules/UFO/CalcHep model files are available |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/24 14:04] andre.lessa |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Project Acronym: RDM | Project Acronym: RDM | ||
| - | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig. | + | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Andre Lessa |
| [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| * The provided mathematica notebook has been used to generate {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ufo.tgz | UFO}} and {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ch.tgz | CalcHep}} model files. | * The provided mathematica notebook has been used to generate {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ufo.tgz | UFO}} and {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ch.tgz | CalcHep}} model files. | ||
| * Here is a {{ 2019:groups:bsm:note_benj.pdf | note }} detailing what has been implemented. The {{ 2019:groups:bsm:note_benj.tex | TeX }} version is also available. | * Here is a {{ 2019:groups:bsm:note_benj.pdf | note }} detailing what has been implemented. The {{ 2019:groups:bsm:note_benj.tex | TeX }} version is also available. | ||
| - | * **The model still needs to be double-checked by an independent pair of eyes!** | + | * Important message from Benj: **The model still needs to be double-checked by an independent pair of eyes!** |
| 2- RD explained by mS1=2 TeV, and both lq couplings being 1. (From D. Marzocca). Anomaly explained by lambda_bv * lambda_ctau / mS1^2. | 2- RD explained by mS1=2 TeV, and both lq couplings being 1. (From D. Marzocca). Anomaly explained by lambda_bv * lambda_ctau / mS1^2. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| 5- study relic density (after 1-4 are done). Jan | 5- study relic density (after 1-4 are done). Jan | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** References ** | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.01789.pdf|1902.01789]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.08179.pdf|1808.0819]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.05849.pdf|1704.05849]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.07583.pdf|1608.07583]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.10151.pdf|CMS-EXO-17-015]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/17790/sessions/10839/attachments/50940/65234/Stangl_1811_Arles_NP_models.pdf|Zoology of New Physics Models for the Flavour Anomalies]] | ||
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/27 17:19 by jose.zurita
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
