This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 11:51] jose.zurita |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 16:30] benjamin.fuks |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | ||
- | Goal (ambitious): study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter. | + | Goal (pseudo-ambitious): study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter. |
Goal (concrete): use the S1 leptoquark model that solves RD and RD* and study the dark matter aspect. | Goal (concrete): use the S1 leptoquark model that solves RD and RD* and study the dark matter aspect. | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | ||
- | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS | + | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS |
+ | **From Benj: the yD coupling is included already. What is wrong with it?** | ||
- | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB | + | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB, AB |
3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL | 3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL |