This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 13:51] jose.zurita |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 14:23] aoife.bharucha |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS | ||
- | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB | + | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB, AB |
3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL | 3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL |