2019:groups:bsm:rdm
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 13:51] jose.zurita |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 17:11] adil.jueid |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Project Acronym: RDM | Project Acronym: RDM | ||
| - | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay | + | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay, Adil Jueid. |
| [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | ||
| - | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS | + | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS |
| + | **From Benj: the yD coupling is included already. What is wrong with it?** | ||
| - | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB | + | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB, AB |
| 3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL | 3- Monojet bounds on chi1: Assuming that chi1 decays are soft an go undetected, there will be ***unavoidable*** direct bounds from monojets on the mchi1 mass [Note that in the simplified model chi1 decays 100% into chi0 + SM particles, so there is no branching ratio dillution here). Persons in charge: JZ, DS, AL | ||
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/27 17:19 by jose.zurita
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
