This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/25 16:30] benjamin.fuks |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 17:19] jose.zurita |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Project Acronym: RDM | Project Acronym: RDM | ||
- | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay | + | Interested people: Benj, Andreas Goudelis, Genevieve Belanger, Dipan Sengupta, Aoife Bharucha, José Zurita, Jose Miguel No, Jordan Bernigaud, Jan Heisig, Giacomo Polesello, Priscilla Pani, Biplob Bhattacherjee, Andre Lessa, Cedric Delaunay, Adil Jueid. |
- | [Feel free to add your name here and edit tasks!] | + | [Feel free to edit tasks!] |
Goal (pseudo-ambitious): study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter. | Goal (pseudo-ambitious): study the interplay between RD anomalies and Dark Matter. | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Setup: Work in a model with 3 new particles (S1, chi1, chi0) and 3 couplings y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} and y_D. S1 is a scalar leptoquark solving the RD anomalies, chi1 and chi0 are fermions, probably close in mass, with chi0 being a SM singlet, hence chi1 has the same SM gauge charges as S1. | Setup: Work in a model with 3 new particles (S1, chi1, chi0) and 3 couplings y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} and y_D. S1 is a scalar leptoquark solving the RD anomalies, chi1 and chi0 are fermions, probably close in mass, with chi0 being a SM singlet, hence chi1 has the same SM gauge charges as S1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tasks (updated from 27.06.2019) | ||
+ | |||
+ | 0- We will meet on 16.07.2017 at 16:00 CERN time!!! | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1- Existing UFO seems to work. AG wants to check the .fr file. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2- Flavor constraints: Marco made a survey of existing bounds. To make a long story short: | ||
+ | |||
+ | a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). | ||
+ | |||
+ | c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL < = yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) Relic density: from coannihilation, GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4) Recasting collider searches: | ||
+ | i) Benj wants to set-up the recast of the LQ_res + MET search. | ||
+ | ii) Bounds on chi1 come from mono/multi-jet + MET. Some of these were recasted in Fig.7 of [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.00452.pdf|1703.00452]] (take the XF3 shaded region), which means that 500-600 GeV were excluded with the ATLAS 13.3 fb-1 search, and that HL-LHC will push the bounds to 1.1 - 1.3 TeV. Bound is almost independent on the compression (mchi1-mchi0). | ||
+ | iii) bounds from l + LQ, where LQ -> a) tau charm, b) top +tau and c) b nu. Easier to have the charm in the initial state, due to PDF suppression (but b is also possible). Giacomo, José and Jordan will look into existing searches that could give constraints. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5) 1-loop direct detection is under investigation | ||
+ | |||
+ | 6) Jordan will set-up a Dropbox folder for the project | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | Tasks (updated, from 25.06.2019): | ||
- | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge:JB, DS | + | 1- Expand existing UFO for dark matter: add yD coupling. Make it Micromegas friendly by including tildes for dark particles (see below for details on the model). In charge: Benj,JB, DS |
- | **From Benj: the yD coupling is included already. What is wrong with it?** | + | * FeynRules implementation (v2) + toy mathematica notebook: {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.fr.v2.tgz | here}}. |
+ | * CalcHEP/UFO v2 files: {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ch.v2.tgz | CH}} and {{ 2019:groups:bsm:lqdm.ufo.v2.tgz | UFO}}. | ||
2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB, AB | 2- Check flavor constraints: how much can we relax y^L_{3X}, y^{R}_{23} / mS1^2 = 1/(4 TeV^2)? Interest is to lower mS1 and the couplings as much as possible without colliding with other flavor bounds coming from e.g: D-Dbar mixing (that would apply on combinations of couplings and masses, y^{R}_{23}^2 / mS1^2 ). Persons in charge: MN, JB, AB |