User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:bsm:rdm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:45]
jose.zurita a
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49]
jose.zurita
Line 13: Line 13:
 Tasks (updated from 27.06.2019) Tasks (updated from 27.06.2019)
  
 +0- We will meet on 16.07.2017 at 16:00 CERN time!!!
 1- Existing UFO seems to work. AG wants to check the .fr file. 1- Existing UFO seems to work. AG wants to check the .fr file.
 2- Flavor constraints:​ Marco made a survey of existing bounds. To make a long story short 2- Flavor constraints:​ Marco made a survey of existing bounds. To make a long story short
Line 24: Line 25:
 4) Recasting collider searches: 4) Recasting collider searches:
 i) Benj wants to set-up the recast of the LQ_res + MET search. i) Benj wants to set-up the recast of the LQ_res + MET search.
-ii) Bounds on chi1 come from mono/​multi-jet + MET. Some of these were recasted in Fig.7 of [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1703.00452.pdf|External Link]]+ii) Bounds on chi1 come from mono/​multi-jet + MET. Some of these were recasted in Fig.7 of [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1703.00452.pdf|this fantastic paper]] (take the XF3 shade), which means that 500-600 GeV were excluded with the ATLAS 13.3 fb-1 search, and that HL-LHC will push the bounds to 1.1 - 1.3 TeV. Bound is almost independent on the compression (mchi1-mchi0). 
 +iii) bounds from l + LQ, where LQ -> a) tau charm, b) top +tau and c) b nu. Easier to have the charm in the initial state, due to PDF suppression (but b is also possible). Giacomo, José and Jordan will look into existing searches that could give constraints.
  
  
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/27 17:19 by jose.zurita