User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:bsm:rdm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49]
jose.zurita
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49]
jose.zurita
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 0- We will meet on 16.07.2017 at 16:00 CERN time!!! 0- We will meet on 16.07.2017 at 16:00 CERN time!!!
 +
 1- Existing UFO seems to work. AG wants to check the .fr file. 1- Existing UFO seems to work. AG wants to check the .fr file.
-2- Flavor constraints:​ Marco made a survey of existing bounds. To make a long story short+ 
 +2- Flavor constraints:​ Marco made a survey of existing bounds. To make a long story short:
  
 a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds.
 +
 b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed).
 +
 c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL <= yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL <= yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies
  
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/27 17:19 by jose.zurita