This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49] jose.zurita |
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:50] jose.zurita |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. | a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. | ||
+ | |||
b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). | b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). | ||
- | c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL <= yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies | + | |
+ | c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL < = yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies | ||
3) Relic density: from coannihilation, GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO. | 3) Relic density: from coannihilation, GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO. |