User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:bsm:rdm

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:49]
jose.zurita
2019:groups:bsm:rdm [2019/06/27 16:50]
jose.zurita
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds. a) D-Dbar mixing is suppressed by theta_C^3 and one chirality flip. Gives no meaningful bounds.
 +
 b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed). b) Bc -> tau nu, Z->tau tau (1-loop x EFT) give bounds (computed).
-c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL <= yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies+ 
 +c) Sewing altogether the allowed region can be displayed in the yL23-yR33 plane, with the results that yL < = yR. The scaling with S1 mass is seemingly trivial (to be checked). Plot by Marco will come soon (from Davide). Ref point of mS1=1.5 TeV, yL=1=yR solves the RD anomalies
  
 3) Relic density: from coannihilation,​ GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO. 3) Relic density: from coannihilation,​ GB says that mchi1=890 and mchi0=800 with yd=1 gives the right relic. Ongoing work (Jan, André, Genevieve) on checking the CDFO.
2019/groups/bsm/rdm.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/27 17:19 by jose.zurita