This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 10:29] emanuele.re |
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 10:55] carlo_enrico.pandini |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging) | * tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging) | ||
* for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). | * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). | ||
+ | * for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties | ||
+ | * for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Rivet code** | ||
+ | * STXS-rivet routine (will add link here): keep unchanged to run over STXS bin selection | ||
+ | * VH-HXSWG-rivet routine (will add link here): use this to include additional variables, and any modification we might want to consider | ||
+ | * we can for each MC setup run both routines, to get results for both "substudies" | ||
+ |