This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 10:59] carlo_enrico.pandini |
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 21:32] emanuele.re |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* 2 "substudies": 1 targeted to just the [[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/LHCPhysics/LHCHXSWGFiducialAndSTXS/simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf|STXS bins]], one with some more differential distributions | * 2 "substudies": 1 targeted to just the [[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/LHCPhysics/LHCHXSWGFiducialAndSTXS/simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf|STXS bins]], one with some more differential distributions | ||
* tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging) | * tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging) | ||
- | * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). | + | * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). Otherwise, can also do H->bb, but in this case we need to have the complete information in the HepMC also for sherpa, as Rivet looks for Higgs and Z as the last entry with correct id before the decay.. |
* for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties | * for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties | ||
* for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement | * for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement |