User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:higgs:ggzh

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 10:59]
carlo_enrico.pandini
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/17 21:32]
emanuele.re
Line 20: Line 20:
   * 2 "​substudies":​ 1 targeted to just the [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​pub/​LHCPhysics/​LHCHXSWGFiducialAndSTXS/​simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf|STXS bins]], one with some more differential distributions   * 2 "​substudies":​ 1 targeted to just the [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​pub/​LHCPhysics/​LHCHXSWGFiducialAndSTXS/​simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf|STXS bins]], one with some more differential distributions
   * tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging)   * tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging)
-  * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). ​+  * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). Otherwise, can also do H->bb, but in this case we need to have the complete information in the HepMC also for sherpa, as Rivet looks for Higgs and Z as the last entry with correct id before the decay..
   * for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties   * for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties
   * for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement   * for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement
2019/groups/higgs/ggzh.txt ยท Last modified: 2019/06/18 16:49 by carlo_enrico.pandini