User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:higgs:ggzh

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/12 22:24]
carlo_enrico.pandini
2019:groups:higgs:ggzh [2019/06/18 16:49] (current)
carlo_enrico.pandini
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== gg -> ZH + 0/1 Jet ====== ====== gg -> ZH + 0/1 Jet ======
  
-**Project ​Descripton**+**Project ​Description**
  
 Look at MC multileg 0+1jet@LO description of ggZH process, compare nominal prediction vs simple LO MC. Look at MC multileg 0+1jet@LO description of ggZH process, compare nominal prediction vs simple LO MC.
Line 8: Line 8:
 **Interested Participants** **Interested Participants**
  
-Carlo Pandini, Emanuele Re, Milene Calvetti, Valerio Dao, Enrico Bothmann+Carlo Pandini, Emanuele Re, Milene Calvetti, Valerio Dao, Enrico Bothmann, Paolo Francavilla 
 + 
 +**Preliminary Sherpa results** 
 + 
 +Here is a first proof-of-principle nominal prediction for 0+1jet@LO with Sherpa: 
 +  * [[https://​www.theorie.physik.uni-goettingen.de/​~bothmann/​les_houches_2019_zh_gluon_initiated/​rivet-plots/​|Rivet Plots]] 
 +  * [[https://​www.theorie.physik.uni-goettingen.de/​~bothmann/​les_houches_2019_zh_gluon_initiated/​setups/​zh/​zh.dat|Config File]] 
 + 
 +**Points to consider** 
 +  * check that e.g. powheg+py8 and mg5+py8 give the same, if the shower starting scale is the same 
 +  * 2 "​substudies":​ 1 targeted to just the [[https://​twiki.cern.ch/​twiki/​pub/​LHCPhysics/​LHCHXSWGFiducialAndSTXS/​simplifiedXS_VH_1.1.pdf|STXS bins]], one with some more differential distributions 
 +  * tools: powheg+py8 (current baseline for ATLAS/CMS), mg5+py8 (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging), sherpa (0 jet / 0+1 jet LO merging) 
 +  * for this study: H undecayed, Z decaying to 1 lepton family. Check that stxs rivet routine can do this (for py8 as well as sherpa). Otherwise, can also do H->bb, but in this case we need to have the complete information in the HepMC also for sherpa, as Rivet looks for Higgs and Z as the last entry with correct id before the decay.. 
 +  * for STXS unc.: consider jet pT spectrum (for definition of nJet bins) and impact on uncertainties 
 +  * for mg5+py8 validation: m(VH) is a good variable to check inclusive / 0+1jet multileg agreement 
 + 
 +**Rivet code** 
 +  * [[https://​gitlab.cern.ch/​LHCHIGGSXS/​LHCHXSWG2/​STXS/​Classification|STXS-rivet routine]]: keep unchanged to run over STXS bin selection 
 +  * VH-HXSWG-rivet routine (will add link here): use this to include additional variables, and any modification we might want to consider 
 +  * we can for each MC setup run both routines, to get results for both "​substudies"​ 
2019/groups/higgs/ggzh.1560371071.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/06/12 22:24 by carlo_enrico.pandini