This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2019:groups:higgs:gildener [2019/10/30 16:13] jonathan.butterworth |
2019:groups:higgs:gildener [2019/10/31 12:58] (current) jonathan.butterworth |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
{{:2019:groups:higgs:combinedhybrid2hdm_lh2.png?500|}} | {{:2019:groups:higgs:combinedhybrid2hdm_lh2.png?500|}} | ||
- | As you can see, the measurements disfavour $\tan\beta > 1$ regardless of $M = M_A$. There is some increase in sensitivity at high $M_A$. We can also plot the same data as a function of $M_{H^\prime}$: | + | Explanation of the legend: |
+ | On the left, yellow means excluded at 95% c.l. or more, green at 68%-95% (ie 2 and 1 sigma). | ||
+ | On the right, the same exclusions are shown but on a continuous scale (indicated by the bar on the right) with | ||
+ | 1 being fully excluded, 0 being zero sensitivity. | ||
- | KL: The sensitivity plots BELOW are new (received from JB on 23 October 2019). | + | |
+ | As you can see, the measurements disfavour $\tan\beta > 1$ regardless of $M = M_A$. There is some increase in sensitivity at high $M_A$. We can also plot the same data as a function of $M_{H^\prime}$: | ||
{{:2019:groups:higgs:combinedhybrid2hdm_lh2_mh2.png?500|}} | {{:2019:groups:higgs:combinedhybrid2hdm_lh2_mh2.png?500|}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 51: | ||
{{:2019:groups:higgs:atlas_8_lljetmesh_lh2_mh3.png?200|}} | {{:2019:groups:higgs:atlas_8_lljetmesh_lh2_mh3.png?200|}} | ||
- | Lepton+MET+X measurements (mostly $W$+jet or top) also have their best sensitivity at quite $M$, but a bit lower than the dileptons, so at intermediate $M_{H^\prime}$, see below the same scan plotted against the two different masses. | + | Looking into the processes which might be cause this, for the point $M_A = M(h_3) = 410$ GeV and $\tan\beta=0.35$, |
+ | we get about $2\sigma$ exclusion coming from the ATLAS and CMS $Z+$jet measurements. For these parameters, | ||
+ | $H$ and $H^\prime$ decay mainly to $b\bar{b}$, but $A$ decays 90% to $H^\prime Z$, which seems to be the likely source of this sensitivity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lepton+MET+X measurements (mostly $W$+jet or top) also have their best sensitivity at quite high $M$, but a bit lower than the dileptons, so at intermediate $M_{H^\prime}$, see below the same scan plotted against the two different masses. | ||
{{:2019:groups:higgs:cms_13_lmetjetmesh_lh2_mh2.png?200|}} | {{:2019:groups:higgs:cms_13_lmetjetmesh_lh2_mh2.png?200|}} | ||
{{:2019:groups:higgs:cms_13_lmetjetmesh_lh2_mh3.png?200|}} | {{:2019:groups:higgs:cms_13_lmetjetmesh_lh2_mh3.png?200|}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | This seems to likely come from the $h^\pm \rightarrow W H^\prime$ decay (88% BF). | ||
The inclusive $\gamma$ measurements also have some sensitivity, which shows a sharp cutoff once $M_A > 350$ GeV. (See below.) | The inclusive $\gamma$ measurements also have some sensitivity, which shows a sharp cutoff once $M_A > 350$ GeV. (See below.) |