This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
2019:groups:higgs:higgseft [2019/06/13 08:59] paolo.francavilla |
2019:groups:higgs:higgseft [2019/06/18 12:28] josh.mcfayden |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
A preliminar set of topics that can be discussed are: | A preliminar set of topics that can be discussed are: | ||
- | -> How does the inclusion of ggZH at NLO affects the parametrization of the STXS bins in terms of EFT parameters? | + | -> How does the inclusion of ggZH at NLO affects the parametrization of the STXS bins in terms of EFT parameters? https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.08193.pdf |
- | -> Effects of the final state selection requirements | + | -> Comparisons of SMEFTsim and SMEFTatNLO running both at LO to check the consistency |
+ | -> Understand what both tools include and agree on a "wishlist" if important features are missing. | ||
- | -> Which is the best strategy to select the parameters that a measurement can constrain? There are typically large correlations between EFT coefficients, would combination of "independent" set ofparameters difficult the interpretation of the constraints? | ||
- | |||
- | -> Compare sigma_EFT,LO/sigma_SM,LO vs. sigma_EFT_NLO/sigma_SM,NLO | ||
- | |||
- | A discussion will take place on Thursday at 10:00 in the library | ||
**Interested Participants** | **Interested Participants** | ||
- | María Moreno Llacer | + | María Moreno Llacer, Marco Delmastro, Ana Cueto, Nicolas Berger, Paolo Francavilla, Saskia Falke, Daniel de Florian, Mauro Donega, Josh McFayden, Add your name :) |
- | + | ||
- | Marco Delmastro | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Ana Cueto | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Nicolas Berger | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Paolo Francavilla | + |