This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2019:groups:higgs:higgseft [2019/06/19 11:36] ana_rosario.cueto_gomez |
2019:groups:higgs:higgseft [2019/06/19 11:40] (current) ana_rosario.cueto_gomez |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
**Project Description** | **Project Description** | ||
+ | |||
-> Comparisons of SMEFTsim and SMEFTatNLO running both at LO to check the consistency | -> Comparisons of SMEFTsim and SMEFTatNLO running both at LO to check the consistency | ||
- | Especially for ttH and ZH-> the operators affecting these production channels will appear in ggZH. | + | Especially for ttH and ZH-> the operators affecting these production channels will appear in ggZH. |
- | The definition of operators in the NLO model can be found in http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/attachment/wiki/SMEFTatNLO/definitions.pdf and in page 49 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.06492.pdf for the LO model. | + | The definition of operators in the NLO model can be found in http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/attachment/wiki/SMEFTatNLO/definitions.pdf and in page 49 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.06492.pdf for the LO model. |
- | Main difference in the implementation is for complex operators, in SMEFT LO there is a phase and an absolute value whereas only one real value can be modified in the NLO model. | + | The main difference in the implementation is for complex operators, in SMEFT LO there is a phase and an absolute value whereas only one real value can be modified in the NLO model. |
-> Study of ggH and ggZH at NLO. Similar studies published: | -> Study of ggH and ggZH at NLO. Similar studies published: | ||
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.08193.pdf (ggZH, limited set of operators studied) | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.08193.pdf (ggZH, limited set of operators studied) | ||
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.00460.pdf (ggH) | https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.00460.pdf (ggH) | ||
- | For the generation of the interference term we need to interfere tree level (from the EFT) with loop-induced processes (from the SM). Madgraph is not able to do it for the official versions, but some documentation on how to do it has been gathered: | + | For the generation of the interference term we need to interfere tree level (from the EFT) with loop-induced processes (from the SM). Madgraph is not able to do it for the official versions, but some documentation on how to do it has been gathered: |
https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/LoopInducedTimesTree | https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/LoopInducedTimesTree | ||
- | It can be also done using the reweighting module. | + | It can be also done using the reweighting module. |
- | Link to the STXT Rivet routine: https://gitlab.cern.ch/LHCHIGGSXS/LHCHXSWG2/STXS/Classification | + | Link to the STXT Rivet routine: |
- | that also provides histograms of common kinematic variables. | + | https://gitlab.cern.ch/LHCHIGGSXS/LHCHXSWG2/STXS/Classification |
+ | that also provides histograms of common kinematic variables. | ||