User Tools

Site Tools


2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars [2019/06/27 13:39]
shilpi.jain
2019:groups:higgs:lightscalars [2019/06/28 09:09]
jonathan.butterworth
Line 17: Line 17:
 Below 80-90GeV, for a generic (pseudo-)scalar $\phi$ (light Higgs, radion, dilaton, axion, ALP'​s...),​ the decay $\phi$ → Z*Z is kinematically closed and $\phi$ → $\gamma\gamma$ becomes challenging to trigger on, so that the gluon-gluon Fusion mechanism to produce $\phi$ is not promising anymore (see for instance [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1607.08653|1607.08653]]). Below 80-90GeV, for a generic (pseudo-)scalar $\phi$ (light Higgs, radion, dilaton, axion, ALP'​s...),​ the decay $\phi$ → Z*Z is kinematically closed and $\phi$ → $\gamma\gamma$ becomes challenging to trigger on, so that the gluon-gluon Fusion mechanism to produce $\phi$ is not promising anymore (see for instance [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1607.08653|1607.08653]]).
  
-  * Quick contur study using the BNT ALP UFO file. All couplings set to zero except the photons which is scanned over. {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​combinedhybrid.pdf | 2D scan }}. Over a wide range of $\phi$ masses ($M_{ALP}$ on the plot) the sensitivity extends down to $C_{\gamma\gamma}/​\Lambda \approx 3$ TeV$^{-1}$. ​ +  * Quick contur study using the BNT ALP UFO file. All couplings set to zero except the photons which is scanned over. {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​combinedhybrid.pdf | 2D scan }}. Over a wide range of $\phi$ masses ($M_{ALP}$ on the plot) the sensitivity extends down to $C_{\gamma\gamma}/​\Lambda \approx 3$ TeV$^{-1}$. ​Here the scan is performed over the following ranges: $m_a:$ 1 to 50 GeV, $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$:​ 10 to $10^{-6}$, $g_{aZ\gamma}$:​ 10 to $10^{-6}$ ​   
-    +
   * Checking at an example point in the above scan, $M_{ALP} = 1.8$ GeV, $C_{\gamma\gamma}/​\Lambda = 5.2$ TeV$^{-1}$, all other couplings set to zero. The $\phi$ decays 100% to $\gamma\gamma$ as expected (width $10^{-7}$ GeV). The main production mechanisms are $\gamma, W$ or $Z$ + $\phi$. $gg \rightarrow \phi$ is zero. The different subprocess cross sections are visible in the example Herwig output file: {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​lhc-s101-runpoint_0095.out.txt | lhc-s101-runpoint_0095.out}}   * Checking at an example point in the above scan, $M_{ALP} = 1.8$ GeV, $C_{\gamma\gamma}/​\Lambda = 5.2$ TeV$^{-1}$, all other couplings set to zero. The $\phi$ decays 100% to $\gamma\gamma$ as expected (width $10^{-7}$ GeV). The main production mechanisms are $\gamma, W$ or $Z$ + $\phi$. $gg \rightarrow \phi$ is zero. The different subprocess cross sections are visible in the example Herwig output file: {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​lhc-s101-runpoint_0095.out.txt | lhc-s101-runpoint_0095.out}}
 +  * Some more scans as suggested by Aoife and Jose:
 +  * {{:​2019:​groups:​higgs:​combinedhybrid50.png?​200|}} ​
 +  * {{:​2019:​groups:​higgs:​combinedhybrid30.png?​200|}}
 +  * {{:​2019:​groups:​higgs:​combinedhybrid10.png?​200|}}
  
 For instance, Higgs composite models with additional light scalars:​[[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1810.11142.pdf|1710.11142]],​ [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1902.08690.pdf|1902.08690]]. For instance, Higgs composite models with additional light scalars:​[[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1810.11142.pdf|1710.11142]],​ [[https://​arxiv.org/​pdf/​1902.08690.pdf|1902.08690]].
Line 60: Line 63:
   * ...   * ...
  
-Promising DECAYS: $\phi\to\gamma\gamma$ (and $\mu\mu$, $bb$, $\tau\tau$, Missing E_T ?) [names: **TF**]+Promising DECAYS: $\phi\to\gamma\gamma$ (and $\mu\mu$, $bb$, $\tau\tau$, Missing E_T ?) [names: **TF, JZ**]
  
 General comment: If the particle is lighter than hadronic threshold ($m_a <​3m_\pi<​450\rm MeV$ for CP-odd scalar), the particle is easily long-lived in the reasonable parameter space. Many literature ignores loop-factor $16\pi^2$, which sometimes leads to less physical parameter space. A scale $\Lambda/​C_{\gamma\gamma}=1\rm TeV$ in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1708.00443|1708.00443]] parameterization corresponds to a scale $f_a =6\rm GeV$ in the decay constant (SSB scale).So ALP being invisible is quite possible with sub-GeV mass and $f_a >100\rm GeV$. Estimates with ALP as missing energy in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1409.4792|1409.4792]] (mono-jet), [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|1701.05379]] (mono-W, mono-Z, mono-Higgs) and [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1901.03061|1901.03061]].  ​ General comment: If the particle is lighter than hadronic threshold ($m_a <​3m_\pi<​450\rm MeV$ for CP-odd scalar), the particle is easily long-lived in the reasonable parameter space. Many literature ignores loop-factor $16\pi^2$, which sometimes leads to less physical parameter space. A scale $\Lambda/​C_{\gamma\gamma}=1\rm TeV$ in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1708.00443|1708.00443]] parameterization corresponds to a scale $f_a =6\rm GeV$ in the decay constant (SSB scale).So ALP being invisible is quite possible with sub-GeV mass and $f_a >100\rm GeV$. Estimates with ALP as missing energy in [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1409.4792|1409.4792]] (mono-jet), [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|1701.05379]] (mono-W, mono-Z, mono-Higgs) and [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1901.03061|1901.03061]].  ​
Line 68: Line 71:
 {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp-pr.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1708.00443|Bauer,​ Neubert, Thamm]] with fix for the ALP mass / Higgs/ Z mass bug from Peter Richardson. {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp-pr.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1708.00443|Bauer,​ Neubert, Thamm]] with fix for the ALP mass / Higgs/ Z mass bug from Peter Richardson.
  
-{{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp_chiral_ufo_v2.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|Brivio,​ Gavela, Merlo, Mimasu, No, del Rey, Sanz]] (with fix for the ALP width).+{{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp_chiral_ufo_v2.tar.gz |ALP UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|1701.05379]] (Brivio, Gavela, Merlo, Mimasu, No, del Rey, Sanz(with fix for the ALP width). 
 + 
  
 {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp_linear_ufo.tar.gz | ALP linear UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|Brivio,​ Gavela, Merlo, Mimasu, No, del Rey, Sanz]] (also with fix for the ALP width - GP). {{ :​2019:​groups:​higgs:​alp_linear_ufo.tar.gz | ALP linear UFO file }} from [[https://​arxiv.org/​abs/​1701.05379|Brivio,​ Gavela, Merlo, Mimasu, No, del Rey, Sanz]] (also with fix for the ALP width - GP).
Line 86: Line 91:
     * Z*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma or gammaphi-->​3gamma     * Z*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma or gammaphi-->​3gamma
       * (Above 2 with 'Bauer et al.' model)       * (Above 2 with 'Bauer et al.' model)
-    * h*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma gamma (derive UFO from h*-->ZZ* with add'l functionality?​)+    * h*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma gamma (derive UFO from h*-->ZZ* with add'l functionality?​) ​[**SJ**]
     * qqbar/​e+e--->​Z*/​gamma*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma gamma (started LH 2017)     * qqbar/​e+e--->​Z*/​gamma*-->​Zphi-->​llgamma gamma (started LH 2017)
     * qqbar-->​Z*/​gamma*-->​phi + 2j (VBF version of above)     * qqbar-->​Z*/​gamma*-->​phi + 2j (VBF version of above)
Line 94: Line 99:
     * tprime--tphi,​ phi-->​gamma gamma (singlet pseudo-scalar,​ composite Higgs)     * tprime--tphi,​ phi-->​gamma gamma (singlet pseudo-scalar,​ composite Higgs)
  
-  * Theoretical:​ recasting as 2HDM+  * Theoretical:​ recasting as 2HDM and other benchmark models [**JQ**]
  
   * Experimental: ​   * Experimental: ​
     * '​fat'​ photons [**SJ**]     * '​fat'​ photons [**SJ**]
-    *statistical tool to produce proto-limits after proto-selections [**SJ**]+    *statistical tool to produce proto-limits after proto-selections [**SJ**]: Such a tool is now ready. This uses likelihood ratio as a test statistic i.e. L(s+b)/​L(b). Uses Cls method to quote the upper limits which is commonly and widely used by CMS and ATLAS. This has been cross-checked against the CMS limit tool for cut and counting experiment. But the present code can be extended to do a shape based limit.
  
 Contributions on the above projects to the Friday closing talk (by the Higgs convenors) should include (~1-2 slides): Contributions on the above projects to the Friday closing talk (by the Higgs convenors) should include (~1-2 slides):
2019/groups/higgs/lightscalars.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/28 11:15 by suzanne.gascon